You didn't read past the first paragraph, did you? The stuff is all there in the BMJ article, just rearranged by WND. Try reading paragraphs 7-10..
Anyhow, I don't know if I have an issue with this or not. I have no problem whatsoever with making mental health more accessible and more integrated. I do have a problem with misdiagnosing and overmedicating.
I'll just wait and see what, if anything, gets announced next month and then I'll decide. That's what everyone else should do to.
Sheesh.. I dunno what's up with all the typos in that last post of mine. Anyhow, I guess it's clear enough regardless..
Rearranged? Is that a journalistic term?
Rearranged?
Do you realize what you're saying?
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Where does it even CREDIT bmj.com or say they "rearranged" the article?
After only a few minutes of wading through the PDFs I referenced above (primarily the second one, which was NOT ref'd in the WND article, but IS ref'd in the PDF they DO mention), I must say that I do not think they're being sensationalist at all.
In other words their article seems to me to be right on the money.
This is unbeliveably bad stuff, for everyone but the most incurably statist idealists.
Bears repeating.