Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedom44

"In 2000, the Libertarian nominee received only about 385,000 votes or 0.36 percent,"

Many libertarians, like me, voted for, and even contributed to Bush in 2000. Since he has shown himself to be socially repressive and fiscally irresponsible, in fact, the exact opposite of what libertarians wanted, it is unlikely many of us will make the same mistake this time around.

I know most of you don't care. I don't think we will be the reason he loses even if he does. Mine is just an observation.


53 posted on 06/21/2004 6:51:05 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: monday

And a Kerry presidency will just warm the cockles of your heart,I bet. :-)


54 posted on 06/21/2004 6:53:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: monday; nopardons

Third Party voting only works in the primaries. This is how it works. Say that the Democrats get 35% of the vote, the Communists get 2% of the vote, the Socialist Worker's Party gets 3% of the vote, the Greens get 6% of the vote, and the Libertarians get 2% of the vote. Then, in the general election, the Democratic candidate can look at the primary election results and say: "Gee. 13% of my important constituents feel really strongly about moral-liberal issues, so therefore I will alter my message accordingly in the general election!"


58 posted on 06/21/2004 6:58:56 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson