Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: motife
"Would have been hominids, probably Neanderthal, not humans. "

Isn't that a little early for Neanderthal?
300,000 BC is usually the earliest date shown on timelines for them.

(On the other hand, 400,000 BC...probably some use of fire in limited areas.)
12 posted on 06/21/2004 6:04:40 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: edwin hubble
>>The skeleton was also found with a number of flint tools surrounding it, indicating that it was probably slaughtered by humans.

Ok, how about this: the skeleton is 400k years old, but early people found it dead later. Like those mammoths that cropped up in Siberia, fresh enough to eat. Maybe there was a warm spell 100k years ago and humans spotted these big critters in the ice, then dug into the "freezer" for easy, pre-killed, fast food.

24 posted on 06/21/2004 6:52:29 PM PDT by Graymatter (Let's issue a new $40 bill to honor our 40th president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson