I haven't seen it.
But it's named "9/11"
does Moore try to explain why the terrorists attacked us on 9/11? Play videos of Osama's speeches?
Or like Columbine, is the thesis ignored to make different points?
He lies....it's a Hitler-like propaganda film
Moore didn't gather facts and come to a conclusion. He came to a conclusion and then gathered facts that proved his convictions. His leftwing, anti-American, Bush hating convictions.
Like Rush said. Michael Moore is the modern day incarnation of Joseph Goebbels.
If he's forced to change the name, he could always call it what it is: Unfair-n'-hype 9/11
In late 2002, almost a year after the al-Qaida assault on American society, I had an onstage debate with Michael Moore at the Telluride Film Festival. In the course of this exchange, he stated his view that Osama Bin Laden should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
The friend of my enemy is my enemy.
Could you "Berg list" this one?
Who doesn't slaughter Moore, though? Any body with half a brain and a knowledge of history can. And for that matter, most of those who don't know crap about anything usually think that something is up with his bullsh*t and know that they should be taking what they are seeing with a grain of salt. That's why he's "Michael Moore".
There are no unbiased left-leaning intellectuals who try to defend Moore on fact, because you can't. It's hopeless.
Those who do listen to Moore, don't really care about politics, they are just contemporary American poser/narcisists who are trying to be "cool" by saying they like this knucklehead (see Quentin Tarantino).
For the most part his "fans" are idiotic college pukes who don't vote anyway - if they do vote it's for Nader.
Like Bradbury said about this film, "Who Cares?"