Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. Governor Signs Deals With Indians
ABCNEWS ^ | 6/21/04 | Associated Press

Posted on 06/21/2004 3:09:13 PM PDT by mdittmar

Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs Agreements With Indians to Expand Gambling Operations

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed new agreements with five Indian tribes Monday that will allow a major expansion of tribal gambling in exchange for billions of dollars in payments to the state over the next quarter-century.

The deal allows an unlimited increase in the number of slot machines at the Indian tribes' casinos. The current compact, signed by then-Gov. Gray Davis in 1999, limits each tribe to 2,000 machines.

The tribes will pay the state a badly needed $1 billion this year and $250 million a year after that until 2030.

The agreement allows Schwarzenegger to fulfill a campaign promise to make tribes pay a greater share of their casino profits to the state, which has been desperately trying to close multibillion-dollar budget deficits.

The tribes are the Pala Band of Mission Indians, the Rumsey Band of Wintun Indians, the United Auburn Indian Community, the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians and the Pauma Band of Mission Indians.

Schwarzenegger hopes to have new agreements with as many as a dozen Indian tribes, but not all are receptive to the reworked deals.

One tribe, the Aqua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, has sponsored a ballot measure that would allow expanded Indian gaming in return for a payment to the state of 8.8 percent of tribal net income.

Schwarzenegger is seeking more than that. He also opposes another ballot measure that seeks to tax tribes 25 percent and could allow card rooms and racetracks to operate slot machines.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: tribalgambling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Tamsey
The only thing ironic is the fact that supposed conservatives would have a problem with this.

Er, if you read the old threads, it wasn't we 'supposed' conservatives that had a problem with indian support.

21 posted on 06/22/2004 8:45:31 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

It is the supposed conservatives that knock Arnold for every action he takes and go to great extent to find fault where there is none. The Dems were taking contributions to cater to the tribes and I won't criticize what McClintock was doing because bridges have now been built by Arnold and McClintock.

This was a brilliant way to handle the Indian tribe casinos and is and will continue to be a great benefit to California.


22 posted on 06/22/2004 11:11:54 AM PDT by Tamzee (Noonan on Reagan, "...his leadership changed the world... As president, he was a giant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Did Ah-Nold send us a relief pitcher? Our bullpen needs a lot of help!


23 posted on 06/22/2004 11:13:48 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W - Isara)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
It is the supposed conservatives that knock Arnold for every action he takes and go to great extent to find fault where there is none.

I'm not knocking Arnold. I'm knocking his FR fan club.

24 posted on 06/22/2004 11:20:29 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I'm knocking his FR fan club.

How so? First of all, you are over the line with the "fan club". There were many of us trying to help the GOP win in California but I don't think anyone considered themselves a "fan" of any candidate.

Those folks who thought Arnold stood the only chance of winning were extremely critical of anyone on either side who took campaign funds from Indian tribes. Arnold was the only significant candidate who didn't. What exactly do you feel was "ironic"?

25 posted on 06/22/2004 11:32:56 AM PDT by Tamzee (Noonan on Reagan, "...his leadership changed the world... As president, he was a giant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Those folks who thought Arnold stood the only chance of winning were extremely critical of anyone on either side who took campaign funds from Indian tribes.

C'mon. "Those folks" were only critical of the Indian tribe issue because it made a good soundbite.

I'll make a friendly wager AS takes their money next time (as he is entitled) and "those folks" won't utter a peep.

26 posted on 06/22/2004 11:47:53 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

No, I do believe that most Republicans were critical of Dems taking tribe money all along... that criticism extended to anyone on the right who also took the tribe bribes. Arnold didn't... that left him in a strong position to negotiate a great deal for California.

So you are condemning Arnold for your groundless assumption that next time he runs he will take tribe money? I see exactly where you are coming from.

Have a nice day.


27 posted on 06/22/2004 11:54:35 AM PDT by Tamzee (Noonan on Reagan, "...his leadership changed the world... As president, he was a giant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey

May I suggest a reading comprehension course?:)


28 posted on 06/22/2004 11:56:47 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Excellent suggestion... I do hope it helps you :-)


29 posted on 06/22/2004 11:59:13 AM PDT by Tamzee (Noonan on Reagan, "...his leadership changed the world... As president, he was a giant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs Agreements With Indians to Allow New Way Of Scalping The White Man

Hmmm…is that what goes on inside those casinos? I have chosen not to go in, so I didn’t realize that people were being scalped. It makes me wonder why others have chosen to go inside.

30 posted on 06/22/2004 12:15:11 PM PDT by TankerKC (R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I read in the San Francisco Chronicle that AS may have been stabbed in the back by the tribes, who will use a gray area in the law. Apparently, if the slots are run by a central computer in the casino, they are considered "video lottery terminals" and not subject to paying money to the state. These terminals look like and function like regular slot machines and differences would not be noticed by most players.

Personally, I hope Prop 68 DOES pass. It would make more sense to know that the state will get 30% from the tracks and card clubs, not to mention the percentages to the county and city governments. Slots would also increase the handle for racing and benefit the government and the horsemen.
31 posted on 10/04/2004 9:56:12 AM PDT by GIZMOCRUZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson