Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee
Rogert Ebert is already on record espousing the view that films need not be factually accurate. At the time the film JFK came out and recieved lots of criticism for re staging shots to look like actual historical footage, and other manipulations of facts, he said that historical accuracy was not important, but what mattered was the artist's vision. Of course a documentary would be expected to follow reality more closely but it is clear that Ebert will not allow a few falsehoods to get in the way of a political agenda.
38 posted on 06/21/2004 8:16:57 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
Yes, I've mentioned that Ebert has defended JFK, Nixon, Malcolm X, and other historical biopics for their inaccuracies saying that people shouldn't get their facts from a movie. Now we shouldn't even get facts from documentaries.

The liberals fighting the culture war dumb everything down.

49 posted on 06/21/2004 9:47:05 AM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson