Posted on 06/20/2004 3:21:27 PM PDT by Howlin
You and me both. I've had to see enough of that face and hear that voice on TV this past week. He has his more than 15 minutes.
What do we have to do to make these two hillbilliess go away? I never want to see Clintoon or Hitlery ever again, much less hear their lousy voices. Ever.
You sure about that? (:
Famed by whom, I wonder?
The only genuine emotion I ever saw from Clinton was his anger--everything else was play-acting for public consumption. My sense was that he is a brutal, vicious man (and I have the same sense about his handpicked DNC chairman, McAuliff).
How generous! When a teacher does that, isn't it called grade inflation?
What planet do you come from??
The press fawned over Reagan??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA .. That's funny
There is no statistical evidence that Boomers are some distinctively liberal cohort working their way through the intestines of the body politic. None whatsoever. If any fit that bill to some extent, it was the GI generation. Boomers do however tend to be somewhat more ideological as a generation than those which append them. That is why Boomers are so well represented on this forum. :) Your interlocutor is just pounding the keyboard. Pay it no mind.
Check the dude's profile page. :-)
It's a pretty blue screen *L*
BTW, your hero bill started the Dot Com collapse with his illegal attack on Microsoft! The market began it's collapse the day the judge ruled that MS would have to divide, later overuled. That was the start of the recession slide.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Thanks for the clarification. I listened to most of the "60 Minutes" interview just to see if Goode Olde Dan would ask him about Juanita Broderick. I wasn't too surprised that he didn't. But I was surprised that Freepers didn't bring her up in well over 600 posts. It's almost as if they forgot. I'm sure Dan didn't just forget.
Maybe the bracelet has to do with that voodoo thing we were discussing yesterday.
I did not watch Sixty Minutes tonight, but am enjoying reading the comments here.
You were asking why, if the Clintons had wanted the Sixty Minutes platform to make their case, why the hostility with Steve Croft.
Well, Clinton does not like having to get himself out of his scrapes. It still ticks him off to be pressed. It's why, if this British interview is as purported and he gets mad at the interviewer, it's because he really isn't contrite about Monica.
How hard would it have been to just say to the interviewer, when asked if he was geniunely sorry, to say yes? But no, our psycho Bill does not like to be questioned in any way. Not one little bit. Even when he ends up supplying the spin or lie to once again skate away from having to account for his smarmy ways.
Bless Nancy Reagan for not giving in to the toon when he demanded to speak at RR's funeral. I just had a feeling she was up to that fight...
Thanks for that information. I am slightly less infuriated that Clinton has recreated the Oval Office in his library.
Hey, same here! Actually I agree with alot of what is said about federal employees here on FR, but not for all of us! There are some good people, and the particular branch I work for tends to be a bit more conservative than others.
How many times did Clinton BITE HIS LOWER LIP?
How about the accurate "Wee Willie"?
How about those weird red-white-and blue shoes on BillyBob?
The Senator Sleazy Carl Levin 'Hoot Owl Look'.........
I thought the same dang thing. I thought, now what would he know about that....There he goes again, talking about something he knows NOTHING about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.