Skip to comments.
Supersized meals lead to supersized weight gain for filmmaker
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^
| 05/20/04
| Elizabeth Lee
Posted on 06/18/2004 10:26:58 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
I saw FOX News talk a little on this and found this article at AJC.com. I thought it was an interesting read.
To: BulletBobCo
So what's Michael Moore's excuse?
To: BulletBobCo
Supersized meals lead to supersized weight gain for filmmaker I was expecting this to be another article on Michael Moore.
3
posted on
06/18/2004 10:29:27 AM PDT
by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.freepgs.com/counterpunch)
To: BulletBobCo
A: They need to accept some responsibility, especially the corporations. If you're McDonald's and you serve 46 million people a day, and you tell me you have no obligation to educate your consumers and help them make the right choices. . . . That's absolute malarkey. This is a two-way street.
This is ridiculous. It's not a big secret that if you are going to indulge in this food several times a week, you are going to pay for it in your waistline. Good grief.
To: BulletBobCo
In the movie we showed kids pictures of Jesus and Ronald McDonald... This must be the archaeological find of the millennium!!!!!
I have stepped up eating at McDonalds in an attempt to LOSE weight! Sandwich (no bread), side salad and an unsweet tea - <$4 and exceedingly convenient!!! I have lost 30 pounds in less than 6 months and a recent fitness checkup reported much improved health by all measures. Thanks McD's!!!!!
To: BulletBobCo
Well I am not a rocket scientist by any means, but seems to me if you ate 5000 calories ANYWHERE (even at home) and did not exercise, you would gain weight.
Is the public that stupid that they don't know this?
6
posted on
06/18/2004 10:37:26 AM PDT
by
fawn796
To: BulletBobCo
I want to know why you can gain 24 lbs in 30 days but it takes 14 months to loose it
7
posted on
06/18/2004 10:39:31 AM PDT
by
woofie
( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
To: RepubMommy
If you're McDonald's and you serve 46 million people a day, and you tell me you have no obligation to educate your consumers and help them make the right choices. . . . That's absolute malarkey. What does the 46 million have to do with it?
If my restaurant serves 46 people a day, do I have the same "obligation" ?
8
posted on
06/18/2004 10:42:44 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: RepubMommy
Sorry, RM.
My comment was directed at the speaker in the article, not you.
9
posted on
06/18/2004 10:45:50 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: BulletBobCo
I'm having a hard time believing it took him 14 months to lose 24 pounds. I'm all into slow reasonable weight loss, but half a pound of a month is beyond slow.
The problem with this whole thing is everybody is using it to blame McD, it's fastfood people, it' not supposed to be good for you. Cheap, filling, and if you're lucky tasty, that's the market niche of fastfood. Living on that for 30 days is like living on snackfood for 30 days, not a good idea. And I wonder what would have happened if he'd kept his excercise regimen going.
10
posted on
06/18/2004 10:49:50 AM PDT
by
discostu
(Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
To: discostu
Oops bad math, carried my 1 the wrong way. 2 pounds a month, still beyond slow.
11
posted on
06/18/2004 10:53:05 AM PDT
by
discostu
(Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
To: BulletBobCo
What the article fails to mention is that he would order 5,000 calories worth of food and then eat all of it, even if he was full. Eating like that no wonder he gained all that weight. It seems to be a common thing in movies now- make stuff up.
12
posted on
06/18/2004 10:53:23 AM PDT
by
Vesuvian
("the march of freedom and democracy...will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history...")
To: woofie
As a compensation, the reverse applies to the stock market: the gains are slow, the losses are not.
13
posted on
06/18/2004 10:53:59 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: BulletBobCo
This guy's liver almost gave out.
To: RepubMommy
This is ridiculous. It's not a big secret that if you are going to indulge in this food several times a week, you are going to pay for it in your waistline. Good grief. Nobody warns me about gaining weight when I go to buy Hagen Daaz ice cream ... or potato chips for that matter. What if I buy a pizza and eat the whole thing ... nobody said not to.
These "activists" think they know what's best for me. They don't.
15
posted on
06/18/2004 10:56:14 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
To: BulletBobCo
"Super-size Me" is not a documentary. It is a stupid and prolonged "Jackass" stunt pretending to be a documentary.
16
posted on
06/18/2004 10:56:25 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Don't believe everything you think.)
To: BulletBobCo
A: The apple slices, what a joke that is. You could have carrots or apples, period. You don't need caramel dipping sauce. It's low-fat, yes, but it's loaded with sugar. For every step forward, there's three steps back. So McDonald's can't have anything remotely sweet or fattening on the menu. They will not be happy until McD is serving tofu and only tofu.
17
posted on
06/18/2004 10:58:40 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
To: BulletBobCo
wait eating nothing but fast food ISN'T good for you?!?!?! this is most shocking news since the aids scare in the porn industry
18
posted on
06/18/2004 11:03:02 AM PDT
by
captaindude2
(Soon to be banned again!)
To: RepubMommy
" This is ridiculous. It's not a big secret that if you are going to indulge in this food several times a week, you are going to pay for it in your waistline. Good grief."
I actually went to see this because it looked so ridiculous. While weight gain is an obvious effect of eating this junk food, what isn't so obvious is the liver damage and other problems that came with it. The diet was extreme, but if they're selling products whose effects resemble those of alcohol, we should probably know about it. A few weeks into it, one of his doctors was absolutely flabbergasted at the test results. The only comparison he could draw was when an alcoholic goes on a binge. He was told that if the diet continued, he'd likely end up with Kidney stones and cirrhosis of the liver, among other major health problems.
That was certainly surprising. I expected high cholesterol, a big weight gain, and plenty of gastointestinal problems (as he's not someone who ate much fast food before this experiment), but not liver and kidney damage. Go take a look, it's actually a pretty funny flick.
19
posted on
06/18/2004 11:12:39 AM PDT
by
NJ_gent
To: BunnySlippers
"These "activists" think they know what's best for me. They don't."
I give him credit for bugging McDonald's and making a film, rather than lobbying the government to force fast food companies to comply with his wishes. If he succeeds in changing McDonalds' attitidues towards their menu items, more power to him. I don't agree with a lot of what he said in the movie, but at least he's not trying to force me to agree with him via Congress.
20
posted on
06/18/2004 11:18:20 AM PDT
by
NJ_gent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson