[Polybius]

I'll answer your question; but, with a caveat - Who determined that Joad was a heretic. Even the movies which the Catholics here about herald don't try to obscure as you just have, who's role that was. So, who deemed Joan a Heretic and turned her over to the civil authority for burning? Right, that was the office of the Inquisition which happens to represent most directly - ROME.

The actions Office of the Inquisition in the rebellious Duchy of Burgandy during a civil war with the King of France represents "Rome" just as the actions of the ultra-liberal Ninth Circuit Court represent "Washington".

The verdicts of the Ninth Circuit Court are very frequently overturned by the Supreme Court in Washington.

Once the English were driven out of Roen and the transcripts of the trail became available, the presiding Inquisitor, Jean Bréhal, ruled that the original trial had been tainted by fraud, illegal procedures and politically motivated intimidation of witnesses and it's verdict was overturned.

[OLD REGGIE]

Once the English were driven out of Roen and the transcripts of the trail became available, the presiding Inquisitor, Jean Bréhal, ruled that the original trial had been tainted by fraud, illegal procedures and politically motivated intimidation of witnesses and it's verdict was overturned.

Did it take 25 years to drive the English out of Roen? Why do you bother with your empty excuses? The trial was presided over by The Bishop of Beauvis, Pierre Cauchon, hardly an Englishman. Speaking of "errors". Was the conviction of Pope Honorius for Heresy ever overturned?