Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
But we have to have some way of knowing this. You are simply brushing this research aside because it goes against your beliefs.

I don't have any beliefs in this subject. But one analysis that contradicts the traditional majority historical opinion conducted by someone with a strong vested interest using documents solely from one side of the conflict is highly suspicious.
149 posted on 06/18/2004 6:22:50 PM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: gitmo

Gee, I think I said that earlier myself on another thread.

"We did nothing wrong" - Us, 2000
See, we didn't do nothin wrong... lol


150 posted on 06/18/2004 6:28:55 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: gitmo

"The traditional majority"opinion is that of enemies of the Catholic Church. Could that not make it suspect? The animosity of English public opinion--and I am talking about elite opinion-- toward Catholicism was so great that as late as 1940 Prime Minister Churchill could not be seen with the Catholic archbishop of Westminster, even though he liked the man and preferred his company to the archbishop of Canterbury, whom he did not like.


151 posted on 06/18/2004 6:36:45 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson