[abigail2]

The homosexual lobby's argument goes like this: Sexual orientation, like race, is a non-moral characteristic beyond one's control. Thus, there is no reason that homosexuals should be denied the right to marry since to do so would be to hold them responsible for something they are powerless to affect. The implication is that a homosexual's right to marry a person of the same sex is analogous to a black man's right to marry a white woman, or to a black's right to vote.

Great article Reverend Peterson. How can blacks put up with all this?

[abigail2]

Homosexuality is not about love, it's not about family, and it's not about civil rights. It's about sex – and selfishness. It's about pleasure at the price of morality and dignity, with reckless disregard for the raising of the young and for the traditional family unit. In many cases, it's about imposing a perverse lifestyle on a society based on close adherence to traditional Judeo-Christian values.

Well said Rev. Peterson!

[Mr Ramsbotham]

Race is a condition, not a behavior.

[Always Right]

There are a lot of Blacks that really don't like the comparison.

[DMZFrank]

The comparison of the gay so-called civil rights movement and the black one is entirely spurious. The reason is that the fundamental legal rationale for the activism of the black civil rights movement was the passage of the 14th amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. All of this legislation was passed after much debate and implemented through the small r republican process. This current movement is being fueled by activists and a radical elite contravening the democratic process through judicial activism and the illegal intercession of certain elected officials.