Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recycling Madness (Florence King!)
National Review Online | 3 May 1999 | Florence King

Posted on 06/18/2004 7:51:55 AM PDT by annyokie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2004 7:51:56 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sauropod

read later


2 posted on 06/18/2004 7:56:56 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

I personally take sort of a perverse pleasure in putting empty soda cans in with the general trash. Does this mean I'm bad?


3 posted on 06/18/2004 7:59:39 AM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

I bet that if a serious study was done on recycling, one would find that it makes little environmental sense, and no economic sense to recycle.

For example, I wash out cans and bottles prior to dumping them in the recycle bin. That process uses electricity (to pump the water), propane (to heat the water), and obviously -- clean water. Then there's the extra time spent dividing things up into proper bins, the time spent to take it down to the garage, the extra time spent at the transfer station. For those of us with municipal trash pickup, how much extra labor ($$$) is involved processing recyclibles?

I suspect the only consumer items worth recycling are aluminum cans.


4 posted on 06/18/2004 8:02:21 AM PDT by crv16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton

I think I'm bad for putting cat food cans and bottle caps in with the aluminum stuff. They just weigh the bags at the recycling place.

Thank God you can still burn your leaves here.


5 posted on 06/18/2004 8:03:28 AM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crv16

When we lived in SoCal, the city handed out recycling bins, one for paper, one for glass, one for aluminum.

I happened to be up very early on morning with my baby and saw many Asians out dumping everyone's carefully sorted aluminum cans into the back of their pickup trucks. I later learned that the city had to reschedule pickup do to the enterprising Asians chipping into their profit margin.


6 posted on 06/18/2004 8:06:45 AM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Our little town in Indiana finally gave up on their recycling pickup once a week. More than 1/2 the folks in town did not participate. Can you imagine the waste of gasoline, employee time, etc., generated due to this stoopid idea?

For folks who still want to recycle their milk jugs, pop cans, cardboard, etc., they can drive it to the recycler place. Still seems like a waste of time and energy to me...

7 posted on 06/18/2004 8:10:46 AM PDT by uvular (Please no rain today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crv16

Actually, it's been done. In several ways recycling is bad for the environment. Newspaper recycling uses a lot of fuel to haul papers to distant recycling plants (that would ordinarily be near renewable pulp forests). Furthermore, the chemicals used to process the paper and bleach it are terrible for the environment. In Fairfax County, Va where I live they have a huge incinerator which burns trash, scrubs the smoke clean, and turns the energy into electricity. Yet, because of the recycling movement they have to recycle newspapers. Glass costs a lot to sort and most landfill/recycling locations admit they only actually recycle 20 to 40 percent and dump the rest because of lack of labor. Plastic has yet to find a valuable product that can be made from the bottles so it cost a lot more to recycle it than to dump it. Aluminum cans are the only item worth recycling and explains why you see people collecting them on the side of the road. Recycling has become a cult, immune to criticism and more of a religion that a practical solution to anything.


8 posted on 06/18/2004 8:14:23 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: uvular

We only recycle our aluminum cans and we take them to the recycling place only because it is right up the street from the wholesale bread outlet where you can buy three loaves of bread for $1.25.


9 posted on 06/18/2004 8:15:26 AM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
Re: "I personally take sort of a perverse pleasure in putting empty soda cans in with the general trash. Does this mean I'm bad?"

I had an ongoing argument with some "Aunts" in the Navy who wanted to recycle soda cans. They insisted they go in the cardboard bins so they could get the money. I pointed out I paid full price for the cans and the cleaning crew picked the cans out of the trash each day (the cleaning crew were poor people trying to get off welfare, it was run by Goodwill industries) Yet the Government wanted the money. Geesss what pigs, I continued to throw them in the trash rather than the bins which were poorly maintained and attracted ants (aunts).
10 posted on 06/18/2004 8:40:03 AM PDT by Mark in the Old South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Has anybody else seen the episode of "Bullshit!" (Penn & Teller, Showtime) where they took on recycling? I never thought that recycling, of all things, would be shown to be just that. Amazing, and I give P&T for tackling the subject.


11 posted on 06/18/2004 8:51:06 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
which is why every hardware store now sells box cutters, a particularly vicious instrument once used only in warehouses but now de rigueur for every good little recycler — and the weapon of choice of preteen inner-city thugs who do not yet own guns, who would not now own box cutters if hardware stores did not stock them for good little recyclers.

Here's the real news in the essay - the September 11th hijackers wouldn't have had their boxcutters if it weren't for the lunacy of cardboard recycling.

so...Al Gore and the enviro fringe are responsible for September 11th

/ sarcasm
12 posted on 06/18/2004 9:03:09 AM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
you sir, are a lost soul!
(Just kidding;'}

I've told the story before, but, since I like it, I'm telling it again:
I used to work at Microsoft as a contractor doing IT support. Micro-softies tend to be the yuppie, Birkenstock types, full of the recyclers spirit (usually displacing common sense).
The cafeterias that they have on their campuses are splendid, with good food served at a modest price. At the end of the meal they provide an elaborate recycling center where you are presented with a myriad of receptacles for glass, plastic, food, paper, etc, all laid out in an illogical order. The Micro-softies are dutiful in cleaning their plates and it never ceases to amaze me how they will scurry from one can to another, back & forth, in order to dump their trash. Sometimes the brainier ones resist the obstacle course and simply hand-carry their food scraps to the appropriate can, having dispensed with their plate in an earlier operation.
Me? I just dump everything in the first can that is available.
"But, EEEWWWWWWW!" They would whine, "You're not RECYCLING!"
"No, but it all ends up in the same place." I would respond, "So why bother?"
Several times I get 'Softies to bet me (one for $25.00) that the garbage guys dumped it all into the same truck. Indignantly they would pony up the bucks, and we would walk out back where we could watch the disposal of the trash. Yep, sure enough, you could watch 'em dumping everything from the individual cans into a central hopper.

Easy money!
13 posted on 06/18/2004 9:04:19 AM PDT by rockrr ("If this were a perfect world, Democrats would just be a bad memory - like Typhoid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Heh. Good article. Our city has had curbside recyling for quite some time. We were provided with a small bin for containers: bottles, cans, plastic beverage containers, milk cartons. Paper was to be placed in another container, or in brown paper bags, like grocery bags. Cardboard was to be bundled with no side greater than three feet, and tied with twine. Oftentimes, when we had larger boxes, and lots of them (like when we were doing some remodeling, and had appliances and tool boxes), I just reduced them in size, and tossed them in the garbage bin. Bundling them in the proper size and tying them was a lot of work.

Now, the city has provided us with one 64 gallon bin so that the mechanical arms on the trucks can pick them up. We put EVERYTHING in those bins - smaller bits of cardboard, cans, bottles, plastic containers of all sorts, paper, junkmail. I am wondering if they actually sort it later, or if it all just gets dumped. I haven't watched to see if it goes in a separate truck or not. We also have "lawn trim" cans for lawn clippings and tree trimmings.

The state also recently raised the deposit on bottles and aluminum cans, so that I refuse to toss them in the recyling bins. I save them until I have enough for a trip to the recyling center and can collect a few dollars for them.


14 posted on 06/18/2004 9:15:35 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Bump for later reading


15 posted on 06/18/2004 9:26:18 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
The only recycling program that's worth anything and doesn't end up actually hurting the environment -- and taxpayers-- is composting.

Composting costs next to nothing, provides nice rich new dirt for your plants. And you don't need the government to do a damn thing.

That's the only greenie thing I do.

Heheh, I love that subversive feeling I get when I throw our 'recyclables' in the regular trash. After all, it's only subverting the Green religion.

16 posted on 06/18/2004 10:01:48 AM PDT by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Thanks! I'm a die-hard Florence King fan.

In the part of California where I live we have to deal with 3 huge wheeled plastic trash containers: one for 'regular' garbage, one for recycling, one for grass clippings and garden trash. There are dire consequences for anyone foolish enough to put 'politically incorrect' items in the wrong can! I spend at least an hour every week dutifully slicing up cardboard boxes to exact requirements of the recyclers, smashing pastic bottles and aluminum cans, etc. so I don't get into trouble with City Hall.

My new son in law was formerly the manager of a large supermarket in Melbourne, Oz. He laughs when he recalls all the good people who made special trips to the store to deposit their plastic garbage sacks in the recycling container. "We hauled them all to the tip (dump) and left them with the rest of the trash," he laughs.

Anyone who's watched "The Sopranos" knows who's really behind the recycling business and who benefits from the greatly increased monthly trash fees charged by the city. I've noticed that none of our municipal politicians are ever in need of campaign cash -- at election time posters blossom like California Poppies and so do their 4-color campaign mailings.

17 posted on 06/18/2004 10:34:31 AM PDT by Bernard Marx (Is Karl Marx's grave a Communist plot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casloy

As one who has worked in the Plastic recycling industry would you care to back up your statement regards worthwhile recycled plastic products.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


18 posted on 06/18/2004 10:48:33 AM PDT by alfa6 (Mrs. Murphy's Postulate on Murphy's Law: Murphy Was an Optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crv16
"I suspect the only consumer items worth recycling are aluminum cans."

Actually, glass, steel, and aluminum are all good for recycling. But recycling PAPER AND PLASTICS is a fool's errand. The resulting stuff is ugly, dull-colored, and becomes impossible to recycle a second time. But glass and metals have been recycled for many, many years. I used to have an old "one-volume encyclopedia" that featured the ease with which glass could be recycled and what it could be made into (fabric, insulation, more bottles, etc). It was copyrighted 1939.

19 posted on 06/18/2004 11:23:50 AM PDT by redhead (There are no new sins, just LOTS of new sinners...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alfa6

Iet me put it this way. If the plastic is so damned valuable as a recyclable how come no one is collecting it as they do aluminum cans. Please enlighten me on what products are being manufactured out of old milk containers?


20 posted on 06/18/2004 1:16:43 PM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson