I am sorry to post this, I could not resist:
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/6999-Islamic_call_to_prayer_over_loudspeaker_closer_to_approval.html
HAMTRAMCK, Mich. (AP) ? Only an mayoral veto could stand between a mosque and its bid to issue a five-times-daily call to prayer over a loudspeaker.
The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to amend the Detroit enclave's noise ordinance to allow the Bangladeshi al-Islah mosque to carry the call to prayer between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.
The amendment will take effect 20 days after it is officially published unless vetoed by Mayor Thomas Jankowski, who has indicated he will not do so, WJBK-TV reported.
The loudspeaker-borne prayers have caused ethnic and religious friction in Hamtramck, a blue-collar city of 23,000 that once was overwhelmingly Polish. In recent years, it has become much more diverse; only 23 percent of the city's residents specified Polish ancestry in the 2000 census.
Some Muslims say the call is the equivalent of church bells. Opponents argue that church bells have no religious significance and that allowing the Islamic call, which lasts less than two minutes, unfairly elevates that religion above others.
These loudspeakers are the source of a lot of conflict.
Why can't everyone just have a watch with an alarm?
Does the city sign now read “Welcome to Hamtramckistan’?