"Well of course you do. Show me how you dispute the fact that she was talking about biological children. Which was part of my point, which you neglected to answer in your post to me." It is insulting to only discuss bio kids. That's what angers me and others on this thread. She's excluding him on the basis that he was adopted. Michael was RR's child too, and deserves to be included in discussions about birth order. There's nothing you can say that will ever change my mind about that.
"And good for you for not using the reg date, I never have either."
Good grief. Yes you have. You just posted your registration date here:
"I know some of you have been here a long time, I am a relative newcomer having signed up just a while ago on Nov 27, 1997."
Of course, that's not the date on your homepage, which is odd.
This is discussion board. There are disagreements here all the time. If you want to press the abuse button on me for calling a newbie "creepy" then go ahead. Maybe management will be interested in your complaints about me. I don't have any more time for them.
It is insulting to only discuss bio kids.That's why I encouraged you to read carefully the whole thread. If you had red post #32 and strung all her comments together, you would know she didn't only discuss bio kids.
"And good for you for not using the reg date, I never have either."
Good grief. Yes you have. You just posted your registration date here:
"I know some of you have been here a long time, I am a relative newcomer having signed up just a while ago on Nov 27, 1997."
*sigh*
Yes my humor is hard to get sometime, but that date is the day before the creator of this website's sign up date. His number is 1.
So I guess mine would be -1.