To: SJackson
Well, you can look the relatives up here.
HOLY MOLEY!
You should have a "Check Cardiac Health Before Use" warning label on that link.
I found the two relatives that I had in mind.
One didn't collect a lot.
The other one, who is also "cleaning up" with waste disposal service
collected over a half-MILLION Dollars in that 1995-2002 time period.
As mentioned elsewhere on the thread, the one who might use the money isn't getting
much...the reverse is true of the one already pulling $$$ from other sources/work.
No wonder he's such a happy camper! Just another Sam Donaldson (the wool-subsidy fellar
and news guy)!
14 posted on
06/17/2004 5:55:52 PM PDT by
VOA
To: VOA
Pick some urban areas, preferably affluent areas where there hasn't been a farm in a century.
I'd be OK with some subsidies for working, family farms, they're at a disadvantage (partly created by subsidies). But lots of these folk are investors. We shouldn't be subsidizing investments. Some urban zip codes you'll find them by the hundred. If that means land values go down, they can always sell them to the folk who are farming them in the first place.
16 posted on
06/17/2004 6:14:09 PM PDT by
SJackson
(They're not Americans. They're just journalists, Col George Connell, USMC)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson