Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmstein7

"Blah, blah , blah..."

A very adult response. You don't seem to want to try and defend your conclusion on why the 2 met and how you have such great insight into the matters of others' hearts and minds. I'm anxious to learn, and thirst for knowledge.


56 posted on 06/17/2004 7:02:31 AM PDT by familyofman (out of the night when the full moon is bright comes a horseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: familyofman

What's the point in arguing with you? You are intractable, so it doesn't matter what I say. Therefore, I won't waste my time, or yours, any further.


57 posted on 06/17/2004 7:03:42 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound to the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: familyofman

It seems that you are arguing with the wrong person. JMStein didn't make the assumption that Kerry and Reynolds were meeting to discuss the ethics complaint - the writer of the article did. I think everyone agrees it is a reasonable assumption, especially since Kerry is rarely near the Senate these days.


67 posted on 06/17/2004 7:40:53 AM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson