Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/16/2004 10:09:43 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
I'm weary of this and lean against it unless the Police Unions(FOP) start going to bat for law abiding gun owners.

If it expands to all CPL holders, I support it.

2 posted on 06/16/2004 10:12:34 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Mr. Gorbachev - Tear down this wall" - Ronald Reagan - 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list

BTTT


3 posted on 06/16/2004 10:12:48 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Mr. Gorbachev - Tear down this wall" - Ronald Reagan - 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Sorry that I only include Texas in my What if,

What if you make everyone in Texas Law Enforcement, everyone gets Conceal and Carry, Everyone is responsible for the Health Well being and Safety of everyone else in Texas, "To Protect and Serve" to be "Public Servants"
I would venture a guess that after 6 months, the Crime rates for Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Mexico would have an upward spike, There would be a Dramatic DECREASE in all Crime in Texas as well as a Dramatic DECREASE in City, County and State Revenues, Law Enforcement would have to return to fill the coffers and the TRUE PURPOSE of Law Enforcement would be obvious to ALL. Just another friendly observation and Opinion by Yours Truly TT


6 posted on 06/16/2004 10:22:12 PM PDT by TexasTransplant ("You know, I think the best possible social program is a job" Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Frankly, I think that all C C permits should allow law abiding gun owners to be armed Nation wide. I have always felt this way, but I think that in today's times, it's even more important. I do have to say though...I am very pleased with this decision....26 years active LEO and now retired.

I don't care what anybody says, most off duty Cops and many, many retired LEO's pack when they are traveling anyway.......this simply makes it legal. For what it's worth, I have absolutely no intention of working as a cop just because I carry a gun. Just as most of you might, I would only get involved if I found myself in a life threatening situation, for myself or others. Most cops are taught and even required to simply be good witnesses when they are no longer with a department.


9 posted on 06/16/2004 11:05:47 PM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I oppose the bill on principle. NO SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR COPS.


10 posted on 06/16/2004 11:09:30 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Entirely un-Constitutional.


11 posted on 06/16/2004 11:13:28 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I guess we now have yet another class of "super-citizens".
16 posted on 06/17/2004 5:00:54 AM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

This stinks. The bill should allow ANYBODY to carry concealed anywhere in the nation, provided they meet the same standards as LEOs.
Since, as a group, CCP holders are probably more law-abiding than LEOs...


26 posted on 06/17/2004 10:01:43 AM PDT by Little Ray (John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
One law for me and one law for thee.

Serfs can't be allowed the same rights as the elite.

28 posted on 06/17/2004 10:06:47 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Although 34 states have no restrictions on law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns, 16 states and the District do

That's more than just a little disingenuous. There are plenty of restrictions in all but two states, Vermont and Alaska, but 34 states do have "shall issue" permit systems, which may include Alaska which retained it's permit system for reciprocity purposes. Four, plus DC, have outright bans, the other twelve have various forms of "may issue" permit systems. Virtually all the states with permit systems have lots of "unarmed victim zones" built into their laws.

32 posted on 06/17/2004 9:03:24 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Total BS.


36 posted on 06/17/2004 9:22:08 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson