[mrsmith]

There is an ambiguity about your question. It arises from the court finding neither a federal nor incorporated RKBA.

If there is simply no incorporated state RKBA then there is no change from what we have now- the states are left alone. But if there is also not a federal RKBA (which is a likely outcome) then the states can be legislatively forced by the congress into surrendering the protections in their own laws- as by the examples I gave earlier.

I agree that the incorporation of no state RKBA would not affect things by itself. It would just further show the capriciousness and historical illegitimacy of the court's 14th Amendment doctrine.

[robertpaulsen]

"then the states can be legislatively forced by the congress into surrendering the protections in their own laws- as by the examples I gave earlier"

Save me from looking through 441 posts -- Which examples or what post?

Ken H and I have been going back and forth on this.