Look at the restrictions- not the funding (the housing is a bad example as that is 'voluntary').
Do you agree or disagree that the incorporation status of the Second Amendment is irrelevant to the anti-gun laws in the examples you gave?
Also, am I right or wrong on the culprits being an anti-gun bias coupled with an expansive view of the General Welfare and Commerce Clauses, rather than the Fourteenth Amendment?
Look at the restrictions- not the funding (the housing is a bad example as that is 'voluntary').
I did and I don't care for them.
The only reason Congress can apply those restrictions in the first place is by claiming a grant of power under the GW and Commerce Clause to fund schools, housing, etc. Agreed?