Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv

I thought they'd said that Heisenburg made accurate data transmission via entanglement impossible. Has something changed in the theory?


53 posted on 06/16/2004 2:27:39 PM PDT by NJ_gent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NJ_gent
Has something changed in the theory?

One would think so. That's the way it has been going in science, something new is observed and next thing you know there are papers and conferences and a new symbol appears in the equations. Quantum entanglement is sure interesting, but it is hard to work with and there aren't a lot of observations yet. It may turn out to be very valuable and make all kinds of sci-fi things possible.

60 posted on 06/16/2004 2:32:24 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: NJ_gent; B Knotts

I don't know enough about the current state of the research and the physics underlying it to comment intelligently on those questions (causality & the uncertainty principle) as they're relevant here. But they are very good questions!


91 posted on 06/16/2004 3:08:58 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: NJ_gent; RightWhale; Buggman
Hey, I just found this! "Exact uncertainty" brought to quantum world: Theoretical physicists use 80-year old maths to improve the famous Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
109 posted on 06/16/2004 3:37:01 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson