No where in my replies to you did I claim to being having a private conversation. I said you jumped into the middle of a conversation and changed the subject.
I'm beginning to worry about your reading comprehension skills. :)
In responding to me and arguing with me, you gave me the impression that you do indeed think he is able to communicate just fine.
Let's see if I can make this simple for you... I do not think that the President is the world's greatest communicator. He is not Ronald Reagan. The first time I heard Mr. Bush speak...I realized that. He has trouble with his words and his syntax. What I'm saying is that I don't care that he isn't the world's greatest communicator. I believe, limits and all, he does a fine job.
I am supplying you with a possible explanation
I don't really need you to supply me with anything. I am able to draw my own conclusions without your help, thank you very much.
but don't tell me that it's irrelevant - because it's not.
There you go again... I didn't say that it's irrelevant.
And I explained why this is wrong (what I said was completely relevant). It's not my problem if you don't understand what's relevant to what you're talking about and what's not.
I do not think that the President is the world's greatest communicator. He is not Ronald Reagan. The first time I heard Mr. Bush speak...I realized that. He has trouble with his words and his syntax. What I'm saying is that I don't care that he isn't the world's greatest communicator. I believe, limits and all, he does a fine job.
Ok. That's all very swell.
However, since you AGREE with me then about Bush's communication skills,
1) why did you argue?
2) you might want to consider that his communication skills play at least *some* role in the predicament he's gotten himself into, regarding the whole "what's necessary to prove his case" thing. Just a suggestion. No skin off my nose if you don't.
I don't really need you to supply me with anything. I am able to draw my own conclusions without your help, thank you very much.
Excuse me but:
Why the h**l do you come to Free Republic? To write paragraphs and not have them responded to with any information you don't like, or believe digresses too widely, or adds information you don't want to hear? and tell people to Shut up if they do?
You are aware that this is a discussion site are you not?
There you go again... I didn't say that it's irrelevant.
LOL
You just claimed I "changed the subject" earlier in this very post. If what I did was (as you now seem to be acknowledging) add a relevant comment, how can that be "changing the subject"?