Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pctech

Did not read all of it - gathered it contained the same ol Bush lied rhetoric. The leftish media will not accept that we are in a war against those that will kill us, will not read the facts that have been put before them - why should I honor them by reading their ignorance?

We know why Bush went into Iraq - WMD. Whether we found them or not does not mean they were not there. If Bush had done nothing and ignored as all others did, we would have been in severe risk of an attack. We elected him to protect this country and that is what he is doing.

The whole time he said that the danger was gathering (not imminent as the ignorant press always states) and that it must be met. The whole danger was that Saddam in his hatred of all America would join with the increasing terrorist assaults and provide chemical/biological/nuclear capability to terrorists to deliver to the U.S. for him.

Now those that do not see this as a big danger - do not have my safety or the safety of my grandkids at heart. They care only about getting the White House back for their socialistic agenda to make America weak and an easy target.


4 posted on 06/16/2004 10:25:59 AM PDT by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClancyJ
Did not read all of it - gathered it contained the same ol Bush lied rhetoric

Maybe you should read the article rather than just skim it and then write it off as a liberal filth.

11 posted on 06/16/2004 10:35:09 AM PDT by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ClancyJ

Now those that do not see this as a big danger - do not have my safety or the safety of my grandkids at heart. They care only about getting the White House back for their socialistic agenda to make America weak and an easy target.

Very well put.
...but a target for who ?


16 posted on 06/16/2004 10:44:20 AM PDT by sawmill trash (NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!! NADER !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ClancyJ

"Did not read all of it - gathered it contained the same ol Bush lied rhetoric. The leftish media will not accept that we are in a war against those that will kill us, will not read the facts that have been put before them - why should I honor them by reading their ignorance?"

It's always nice to see an open minded person explain why anyone should pay attention to what he says. You have already closed all lines of communication, don't expect too many people that want to discuss issues with you on a serious level. 2 out of 3 monkeys is pretty good, hear no evil and see no evil.


17 posted on 06/16/2004 10:48:19 AM PDT by familyofman (out of the night when the full moon is bright comes a horseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ClancyJ
We know why Bush went into Iraq - WMD.

Cripes. You know if you read the speeches of Bush, and Chenney, Rice and Powell during the build-up to the war, you'll discover that they laid out several reasons for the war and it wasn't just WMD's. Don't focus on the soundbites. Read Bush's speech in November of 2002 or his SOTU address. Read the complete transcript of Chenney's interview with Tim Russert on MTP. All of the reasons are there.

The problem is that the press can't handle a mulitple-point argument. If they ask the President why should we go to war in Iraq, and he says, "There's point a, b, c, d, e ... etc." they'll say "yeah, yeah, but what's the real (one) reason. It's all soundbites with the press, not substance.

18 posted on 06/16/2004 10:53:17 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson