Sorry! Didn't see your post before I posted mine. I guess that's the problem with having so many people post at once.
This sounds like a guy who 1)knew how to cover his tracks pretty well or 2) a pi$$ poor M.E. or 3) a combination of the two.
Regardless, the jury still convicted him and the judge seemed convinced he was guilty as well. Thought I am leery of some "experts", the fact he confessed tells me he did something he felt guilty for. You could never convince me to confess to a crime against my child if I didn't do it.
Not even if you made me wear my underwear on my head or had some butch looking gal ridicule my manhood! :)
"You could never convince me to confess to a crime against my child if I didn't do it."
Maybe, Maybe not. see my post #87.