[NCSteve]

The man was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.

And, as already pointed out in this thread, OJ was found innocent by a jury. So what's your point?

[CharacterCounts]

My point is 8 days of testimony was presented and a jury found him guilty. It certainly isn't preposterous, as you claim, to assume he is in fact guilty.

To assume his innocence based on what is not reported in a 500 word article is both illogical and preposterous.

It is also illogical to try to generalize an incorrect verdict in one trial to all trials. The vast majority of jury verdicts in criminal cases are spot on.