Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darth Reagan

Sorry, I was in a hurry for a meeting, and wasn't very clear. The numbers represent how much you have to add for Kerry to normalize the data to SUSA. So for Rasmussen, if you add 3.9 you get a result which would be comporable to what SUSA would be expected to show.

I hope that's clear. If it's not, I can explain further.

I'm using SUSA as the base line poll because it was one of the most accurate state polls last time (second behind Mason-Dixon, if I'm not mistaken) and they have quite a few polls out. Also in independent analysis I've done on the election, so far in 2004, they have been the most accurate (this is on the average of course -- any given state can have an odd result).


51 posted on 06/16/2004 1:10:34 PM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: TomEwall

Oh, now I get it. That makes sense. Of course, selecting SUSA is a shot in the dark -- based on historical data which may or may not be indicative of future results.

For national polls, the same method would require picking Zogby as the baseline - based on 2000 results. Which may have been more about luck in guessing the partisan turnout.


52 posted on 06/16/2004 1:20:27 PM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson