Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Ignored Discovery
The American Spectator ^ | 6/16/2004 | Steven Martinovich

Posted on 06/15/2004 9:55:18 PM PDT by elhombrelibre

With the media's focus on chronicling every attack on coalition forces or terrorist attack against Iraqi civilians in Iraq, they might be forgiven for missing other stories occasionally. Reporting democracy at the local level or the opening of a new school isn't sexy work for the most part. It's the equivalent of traveling halfway across the world to cover stories that local beat reporters write every day in your local paper. That focus on Iraqi insurgents, however, seems to have blinded almost everyone to a major story that surfaced last week since it was largely ignored by the media with the exception of the World Tribune and some smaller newspapers.

On June 9, Demetrius Perricos announced that before, during and after the war in Iraq, Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction and medium-range ballistic missiles to countries in Europe and the Middle East. Entire factories were dismantled and shipped as scrap metal to Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey, among others, at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. As an example of speed by which these facilities were dismantled, Perricos displayed two photographs of a ballistic missile site near Baghdad, one taken in May 2003 with an active facility, the other in February 2004 that showed it had simply disappeared.

What passed for scrap metal and has since been discovered as otherwise is amazing. Inspectors have found Iraqi SA-2 surface-to-air missiles in Rotterdam -- complete with U.N. inspection tags -- and 20 SA-2 engines in Jordan, along with components for solid-fuel for missiles. Short-range Al Samoud surface-to-surface missiles were shipped abroad by agents of the regime. That missing ballistic missile site contained missile components, a reactor vessel and fermenters -- the latter used for the production of chemical and biological warheads.

"The problem for us is that we don't know what may have passed through these yards and other yards elsewhere," Ewen Buchanan, Perricos's spokesman, said. "We can't really assess the significance and don't know the full extent of activity that could be going on there or with others of Iraq's neighbors."

Perricos isn't an American shill defending the Bush administration, but rather the acting executive chairman of the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and his report was made to the Security Council. Yet his report didn't seem to be of much interest to a media which has used the lack of significant discoveries to question the rationale for the war. After over a year of searching, experts have managed to find little in the way of the biological and chemical weapons that every major intelligence service -- including those of Germany and France -- maintained existed. We still haven't, but Perricos' report brings us one step closer.

The report neatly disarms arguments that Hussein's WMD programs were non-existent after the first Gulf War. While it's true that these finds are not the chemical and biological weapons we know existed after that war, they illustrate the tremendous difficulty in locating something in a semi-hostile nation larger than the state of California. They also prove that Hussein made ongoing efforts to hide illegal weapons programs from the world. Ironically, he and his agents used the world in which to hide them.

The implications of the United Nations' discovery of how Hussein's regime got rid of many of its banned weapons programs is staggering, especially considering that it happened partly under the watch of U.N. weapons inspectors. And yet many in the media are either unwilling or unable to break out of their cycle of waiting to report the next terrorist attack. The truth about the justification for the war and Saddam Hussein's Iraq is gradually being revealed to the world, but it seems our journalists don't want to tell the story.

Steven Martinovich is a freelance writer in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; perricos; prewarinelligence; tas; unmovic; waronterror; wmd
I'm betting this information will never make it to the TODAY Show.
1 posted on 06/15/2004 9:55:18 PM PDT by elhombrelibre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

"On June 9, Demetrius Perricos announced that before, during and after the war in Iraq, Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction and medium-range ballistic missiles to countries in Europe and the Middle East. Entire factories were dismantled and shipped as scrap metal to Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey, among others, at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. As an example of speed by which these facilities were dismantled, Perricos displayed two photographs of a ballistic missile site near Baghdad, one taken in May 2003 with an active facility, the other in February 2004 that showed it had simply disappeared.

"What passed for scrap metal and has since been discovered as otherwise is amazing. Inspectors have found Iraqi SA-2 surface-to-air missiles in Rotterdam -- complete with U.N. inspection tags -- and 20 SA-2 engines in Jordan, along with components for solid-fuel for missiles. Short-range Al Samoud surface-to-surface missiles were shipped abroad by agents of the regime. That missing ballistic missile site contained missile components, a reactor vessel and fermenters -- the latter used for the production of chemical and biological warheads."


2 posted on 06/15/2004 9:57:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Or any other mainstream news source for that matter. Just doesn't fit in with their vision for America.


3 posted on 06/15/2004 10:01:45 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

I'm betting this information will never make it to the TODAY Show

Perhaps it's time GW went on national tv and made the new appear. That way, the media CAN"T avoid writing about it. There is more than one way to skin a cat.


4 posted on 06/15/2004 10:03:02 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

NOTA BENE Euorpean countries...I am willing to bet that the really good stuff ended up both in Syria and FRANCE that's right I think the frogs got a bunch of it just because I think they are the ones who arranged it to make the US and bUsh look bad...The Russians and CHina and Germany probably had a minor role...but I would bet a bundle on CHirac and his minions


5 posted on 06/15/2004 10:03:14 PM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

bumpo


6 posted on 06/15/2004 10:05:03 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

"On June 9, Demetrius Perricos announced that before, during and after the war in Iraq, Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction and medium-range ballistic missiles to countries in Europe and the Middle East. Entire factories were dismantled and shipped as scrap metal to Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey, among others, at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month. As an example of speed by which these facilities were dismantled, Perricos displayed two photographs of a ballistic missile site near Baghdad, one taken in May 2003 with an active facility, the other in February 2004 that showed it had simply disappeared."

Those dates are wrong of course, we deposed Saddam in April 2003... what's the correct date?

And if this is the case - WHY THE HECK DIDNT DAVID KAY MENTION THIS TO THE CONGRESS IN JANUARY?


7 posted on 06/15/2004 10:08:37 PM PDT by WOSG (Peace through Victory! Iraq victory, W victory, American victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Stillwaters

ping


9 posted on 06/15/2004 10:13:00 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conshack
Perhaps it's time GW went on national tv and made the new appear. That way, the media CAN"T avoid writing about it.

What makes you think they would broadcast it? They don't broadcast any of his other speeches!

10 posted on 06/15/2004 10:15:46 PM PDT by Bommer (RIP Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
The corrected link for the American Spectator article is:

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=6705

11 posted on 06/15/2004 10:16:44 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Thanks,


12 posted on 06/15/2004 10:35:44 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Bump.


13 posted on 06/15/2004 10:46:56 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

What makes you think they would broadcast it? They don't broadcast any of his other speeches!


The network channels have avoided televising his speeches, but the cable news seem much more willing to do it. Can you imagine CNN being almost forced to be pro-Bush...just by airing a sppech !!!
FOX, MSNBC, CNN, etc.


14 posted on 06/15/2004 10:52:15 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conshack

Only problem is that cable news only pulls in a 5th of the audience over commercial TV


15 posted on 06/15/2004 11:08:41 PM PDT by Bommer (RIP Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

The link is messed up..it goes to the posting page not AM Spectator article.


16 posted on 06/16/2004 4:23:44 AM PDT by GailA (hanoi john kerry, I'm for the death penalty, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conshack
What makes you think they would broadcast it? They don't broadcast any of his other speeches!

Yet, the networks are all planning on carrying the "book release" interview with slimy...

17 posted on 06/16/2004 4:28:55 AM PDT by pageonetoo (Rush didn't know! But now, we all know! He probably broke the law!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Those dates are wrong of course, we deposed Saddam in April 2003... what's the correct date?.....The dates may not be wrong. The story says "before, during and after the war..."
18 posted on 06/16/2004 4:37:11 AM PDT by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Also, the new Iraqi president travelled to the US a couple weeks ago and THANKED the American people for liberating his country, shouldn't that have been on every prime time newscast?

Karzi (sp) also thanked American soldiers yesterday at Fort Hood, I only heard this on Fox, and these should be BIG stories!

19 posted on 06/16/2004 4:43:50 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA

See #11


20 posted on 06/16/2004 12:59:25 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson