To: Southflanknorthpawsis
That and never placed his hand over his heart for the National Anthem.
51 posted on
06/15/2004 8:00:18 PM PDT by
txradioguy
(It's Not A Choice Between Peace Or War...It's A Choice Between Fight Or Surrender)
To: txradioguy
Ronald Reagan, Ron, Nancy Reagan and Patti Davis, circa 1967. Inset, Ron Reagan today. The Bush inner circle would like to think of George W.'s presidency as more of an extension of Ronald Reagan's than of his one-term father's. Reagan himself, who has long suffered from Alzheimer's disease, is unable to comment on those who lay claim to his political legacy. But his son, Ron, is -- and he's not pleased with the association. "The Bush people have no right to speak for my father, particularly because of the position he's in now," he said during a recent interview with Salon. "Yes, some of the current policies are an extension of the '80s. But the overall thrust of this administration is not my father's -- these people are overly reaching, overly aggressive, overly secretive, and just plain corrupt. I don't trust these people." - - - - - - - - - - - -
57 posted on
06/15/2004 8:04:44 PM PDT by
My Favorite Headache
(Rush 30th Anniversary Tour Tickets On Sale Now!)
To: txradioguy
That and never placed his hand over his heart for the National Anthem. I didn't kmow that. How disrespectful to his father !!!!!!
To: txradioguy
That and never placed his hand over his heart for the National Anthem.Unless I'm mistaken, it's not protocol to place the hand over the heart during the Anthem. During the Pledge, yes, but not during the Anthem.
As best I can recall, a man wearing a hat removes it and covers his heart with it. But, not so with the hand.
I may be wrong but, that's how I understand it.
69 posted on
06/15/2004 8:13:54 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(We learn by trail and errror. ;-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson