Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Labyrinthos
You have to love Thomas: What he is saying is that he agrees that the Respondent lacked standing to sue in the first place....

How do you figure based on his statement:

Because I agree with The Chief Justice that respondent Newdow has standing,

But I agree, I do have to love Thomas... ;-/

4 posted on 06/15/2004 6:30:43 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine

Because I totally screwed up and missed that and feel like a total fool. Sorry :-(


6 posted on 06/15/2004 6:41:53 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson