Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Modernman
"Nobody passed a law here. This is a business making a business decision. You talk about freedoms but you miss the fact that the ballpark has the freedom to sell or not sell whatever food it desires"

I read and understood the article.

No law was passed here, simply a no peanut section was established.

One would have to be blind not to see the correlation between that and the erosion of freedoms that has become predominate in our society.

With the risk of sounding more rude, I felt like ranting. ;)



While were at it, how about a section reserved for people with dogs. After that we can get a cat lovers section, for those who want to bring their cats to the ball game.

I mean ... I mean ... we could go on forever.

39 posted on 06/15/2004 9:48:39 AM PDT by G.Mason (A President is best judged by the enemies he makes when he has really hit his stride…Max Lerner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: G.Mason
One would have to be blind not to see the correlation between that and the erosion of freedoms that has become predominate in our society.

I must be blind.


While were at it, how about a section reserved for people with dogs. After that we can get a cat lovers section, for those who want to bring their cats to the ball game.

Here's a ballpark that chose to have a "Bark at the Park" and people could bring their dogs. link They had the freedom to let dogs into their stadium, if somebody didn't like dogs they had the freedom to stay home.
42 posted on 06/15/2004 10:08:21 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson