Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran massing troops on Iraq border
The Washington Times ^ | June 15th | UPI

Posted on 06/15/2004 5:34:28 AM PDT by F14 Pilot

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:42:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Beirut, Lebanon, Jun. 15 (UPI) -- Iran reportedly is readying troops to move into Iraq if U.S. troops pull out, leaving a security vacuum.

The Saudi daily Al-Sharq al-Awsat, monitored in Beirut, reports Iran has massed four battalions at the border.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: border; deathwish; iran; iraq; muslims; southwestasia; terrorism; totalitarian; totalitarianism; troopbuildup; troops; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-224 next last
To: Semper Paratus
"The Mullahs need a diversion fast."

I think you nailed it.

Wondering now if a little dust up ('thousands dead in unprovoked B-52/ B-1/ cruise missle strike') would haul the islamic wasteland into line behind Iran, or give their now constrained dissenters a boost for open civil war?

161 posted on 06/15/2004 8:37:44 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Iran has
2 Mechanized Divisions
3 Armored Divisions
5 Infantry Divisions
1 Special Forces Divison
1 Parachute Division
1 SSM Brigade
1 Logistics Bridgade
9 rusty MIG 21's
305 motorized kites
47,396 dromaderies with armored blankets
13 seaworthy naval vessels
12 scrapped naval vessels
and a pratridge in a pear tree






162 posted on 06/15/2004 8:38:05 AM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

Do you know in what part of Iran the nuclear reactor is located?


No but I bet the Israelis do.


163 posted on 06/15/2004 8:45:21 AM PDT by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: eno_
"Well that would do the job, wouldn't it?"

It would, but I really try not looking at this with a jaded eye toward some kind of conspiracy.

At what point do we citizens trust -- explicitly -- what our government's telling us, granting 'em full latitude to do what's right based on that trust?

I say now, hence my placing the onus on the Iranian leadership, their -- apparent -- low IQ and reckless disregard for their own citizens.

Sane nations do not challenge the United States military forces.
They simply don't & there're enough precidents to convince any doubter of that.

"The CIA whips some mad mullah into a frenzy, they take a swing at us in Iraq, and we take them out. The perfect provocation. We could actually declare war. None of this U.N. bullshine."

Yup, yup & yup.

Just one thing though, I sincerely don't believe it'd take our CIA to whip up any of the Iranian mullahs.

...they're all pretty mad to start.

164 posted on 06/15/2004 8:45:22 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Mullahs Gone Wild.

These guys don't want to last very long, do they?

Becki

165 posted on 06/15/2004 8:46:14 AM PDT by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I think you mean S. Korea...or are you saying Iran is bringing in troops from N. Korea?


166 posted on 06/15/2004 8:51:30 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

If you mean Bushehr, it's northern Gulf coast; west of Isfahan>


167 posted on 06/15/2004 8:53:23 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Yes. South. bad typo. I meant the troops U.S. is pulling out of S.Korea.


168 posted on 06/15/2004 8:56:08 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Prediction: massing armies will become obsolete in the early 21st century.


169 posted on 06/15/2004 9:02:39 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

The Brit carrier fleet consists of 3 ships, the Invincible, Illustrious and Ark Royal.

From what I found Illustrious is in dry dock for a major re-fit.

Invicible is always ready to be deployed in 48 hours.

Couldn't find anything about Ark Royal deployment.


170 posted on 06/15/2004 9:05:35 AM PDT by Rebelbase (AKA gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
"They can if they believe what they read in Western media and from certain Leftist politicians in the West."

Come to think of it, you're 100% correct about that.
But man-oh-man are they in for a rude reality check if they have & believed the bilge.

"They'd not be risking this if they did not believe the Bush adminstration felt constrained."

Yea but in light of the complete lunacy of messing with our forces?
I gotta wonder if maybe they've not another, totally different reason to be on that boarder other than the *assumption(s)* they're going to attack?

After all, it is their country.

"Of course, they also fail to realize that they are facing a raw guts poker player, not a nuanced,faux chess playing fop."

Yup, & contrary to the garbage they may have been told about the man by Liberal-Socialist quislings he ain't stupid.

...or indecisive.

171 posted on 06/15/2004 9:07:35 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Landru
Yea but in light of the complete lunacy of messing with our forces? I gotta wonder if maybe they've not another, totally different reason to be on that boarder other than the *assumption(s)* they're going to attack?

A couple of things strike me about this.It is provocative without being an immediate threat. Is it ,as has been suggested elsewhere on this thread,a security apparatus for the border jumpers? Is it a sacrificial target for us to pluck? Is it designed to hopefully muddle the US(and other Western )elections? I'm going to risk sounding a Cassandra, but I think there are all three elements here.What proportion as yet I don't ,and not too many of us do ,know. We shall see soon enough .

172 posted on 06/15/2004 9:27:39 AM PDT by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Remember, the "Highway Of Death" in Kuwait? That same scene would play out in the case of an Iranian invasion.


173 posted on 06/15/2004 9:29:10 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
9 rusty MIG 21's

Iran never had the MIG-21.
They do have
30 MIG-29 (Fulcrum)
24 Su-24 (Fencer.)

They also still have about 150 US made aircraft rated at about 60% serviceable.

Their Navy has
10 Kaman missile patrol boats
10 Houdong missile patrol boats
3 missile frigates
2 corvettes
5 submarines

174 posted on 06/15/2004 9:31:17 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Tagline removed as too offensive. Only defensive taglines may be used.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: omniscient

But they (Iran) have Russia on their side- they signed a defense pact several months ago. Not good.


175 posted on 06/15/2004 9:54:09 AM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Thanks - BUMP!


176 posted on 06/15/2004 10:01:29 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Ronald Reagan to Islamic Terrorism: YOU CAN RUN - BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Bad idea. We have the airspace available to exterminate the vermon.


177 posted on 06/15/2004 10:03:01 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Is anyone really going to be surprised?


178 posted on 06/15/2004 10:16:28 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Dear Jeff,

You write, "the strategic implications of having our forces and ultimately a friendly country nestled right there...sandwiched between Iran and Syria are going to become more and more apparent."

I agree. We can have troups and supplies there. Whenever there is a big problem we can project our forces quickly. If Al Qaeda stages a coup in Saudi Arabia, we can't wait a year getting ready while they mine the oil fileds.


179 posted on 06/15/2004 10:19:20 AM PDT by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

And lots of raghead divisions!


180 posted on 06/15/2004 10:22:35 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson