Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockpile
It remains to be seen, because they'll be hopping the engines up some. However, modern turbofans pretty well approximate the short-field performance of a turboprop from the 1950's, as the P-3's frame and engines are.

From what I've seen, the 737, if it is properly stressed, will handle just as well. Don't forget, the P-3's four engines all turned in the same direction (if you're not a multi-engine pilot, ask one what this means), and there are, well, FOUR of the big, oily things hanging out there. That affects both "G" loading and rolling moment.

With two less engines, but with more overall performance, the 737 SHOULD do just fine. The P-3 started life as the Lockheed Electra, recall...a passenger airliner. We figured out how to do some pretty interesting things in it over 40 years, with sheer ingenuity. We'll do the same with a "P-8".

56 posted on 06/14/2004 8:34:42 PM PDT by Long Cut (Certainty of Death, small chance of Success...What are we waiting for?...Gimli the Dwarf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
I saw the welcome news on your new bird. Bet you are pleased?

I also saw the argument, and decided not to chime in. I have decided that life is to short to argue procurement with couch potatoes on the web.

60 posted on 06/14/2004 8:50:35 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson