Skip to comments.
Gun Control: Dianne Feinstein and the “Assault Weapons” Ban
Mens News Daily ^
| 13 June 2004
| Howard Nemerov
Posted on 06/14/2004 11:41:38 AM PDT by 45Auto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
06/14/2004 11:41:39 AM PDT
by
45Auto
To: 45Auto
How about a ban on Senators who assault inalienable rights, such as the right to self defense? We could call it the "Assaultive Senator Ban."
2
posted on
06/14/2004 11:48:49 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(This is your country. This is your country under socialism. Any questions? Just say no to Socialism!)
To: 45Auto
"Former liberal and gun control proponent Howard Nemerov did his own research, and is now an ardent Second Amendment supporter who
wonders why media and politicians don't tell the truth about guns. He appears regularly on ChronWatch. He can be reached at hnemerov@netvista.net."
The answer, of course, is because then they might not be able to implement the full socialist agenda in the US. People like Feinswine are enemies of liberty.
3
posted on
06/14/2004 11:48:59 AM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: 45Auto
Does Ted Kennedy's car count as an Assault Weapon?
4
posted on
06/14/2004 11:50:13 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
To: 45Auto
This term "assault weapon" used in regard to an evil looking lightweight automatic firearm first appeared in Nazi Germany before WWII.
Does not surprise me to hear Democrats use that term.
5
posted on
06/14/2004 11:58:52 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: 45Auto
6
posted on
06/14/2004 12:03:07 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
To: 45Auto
7
posted on
06/14/2004 12:05:05 PM PDT
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: *bang_list
8
posted on
06/14/2004 12:05:47 PM PDT
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: counterpunch
that's an insult to a pig!
ol' hoghead
To: 45Auto
According to
this, the AWB isn't even a valid exercise of the Commerce Clause, unless they can explain how this is supposed to "encourage manufactures".
10
posted on
06/14/2004 12:10:08 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
(I Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: IamConservative
Does Ted Kennedy's car count as an Assault Weapon?I believe it is defined as a submarine.
11
posted on
06/14/2004 12:13:38 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: 45Auto
I remember hearing about a police officer who came upon an illegal assault weapon in New York State recently. Of course, I expected his mere possession of the weapon to cause him to spray crowds of people huddling in buildings with bullets, because of the flash suppressor, the pistol grip, and the bayonet lug.
Somehow he managed to resist the magical affects of this horrible weapon and bring it to a patrol car.
That's a strong-willed police officer.
12
posted on
06/14/2004 12:20:41 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: Puppage
Temporarily submergeable tomb.
13
posted on
06/14/2004 12:45:53 PM PDT
by
Taquito
To: IamConservative
14
posted on
06/14/2004 12:49:37 PM PDT
by
bad company
(God speed Dutch)
To: 45Auto
15
posted on
06/14/2004 12:58:38 PM PDT
by
50 Cal
To: 45Auto
Semi-automatic assault weapons which fire up to 250 rounds of ammunition within seconds and without warning are weapons of war that do not belong on the streets of our communities. Maybe DiFi would be happy if we had those alarms on our semi-automatic weapons, like the ones trucks have when they back up.
beep..beep..beep..bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam.bam
Personally, my Glock, 'assault rifle' and semi-automatic shotgun have never just fired 250 rounds without warning, but who knows what they do when I'm not home. I'm getting real suspicous about the 3 foot ragged hole in the outside wall of the living room now. The Glock told me the cat did it.
16
posted on
06/14/2004 1:04:14 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: TC Rider
>>Gun Control Means Confiscation If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. Senator Dianne Feinstein, CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995<<
Of course this, "turn 'em all in", does not apply to the common criminal because they are not titled as, "Mr. and Mrs. America", are they Mrs. Communist?
Someday, Mrs. False Patriot, you will get yours. I hope there is not a law abiding citizen holding a .45 Colt and a CCW Permit there to protect you from your attacker/s.
So, you continue to push the UN Plan and don't be dismayed if only .0000000000001% of the President Reagan funeral atendees show up to spit on your coffin.
Sincerely,
xxxxxx xxxxx
17
posted on
06/14/2004 3:28:43 PM PDT
by
B4Ranch
( GET READY!!..-> http://www.ready.gov/get_a_kit.html)
To: 45Auto
For the Khmer Rouge, there was no general gun confiscation, but anyone found with one was murdered on the spot. Don't give Dianne, Chucky, Teddy, and sKerry any ideas. I'm sure they would love to have the power to exercise that particular option. Why else would they be trying to disarm law-abiding, tax-paying free citizens?
18
posted on
06/14/2004 3:53:28 PM PDT
by
spodefly
(This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
To: 45Auto
From the article:
"Semi-automatic assault weapons which fire up to 250 rounds of ammunition within seconds and without warning..." It seems to me that anyone not wounded in the first few seconds can consider the first 125 rounds to be warning shots. I know I would.
19
posted on
06/14/2004 3:53:58 PM PDT
by
William Tell
(Californians! See "www.rkba.members.sonic.net" to support California RKBA.)
To: B4Ranch
So, you continue to push the UN Plan and don't be dismayed if only .0000000000001% of the President Reagan funeral atendees show up to spit on your coffin. Once I got out of Basic Training, I swore I would never stand in line again.
20
posted on
06/14/2004 4:34:04 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson