Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House panel: Reduce NASA role in space launches
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/14/04 | Ted Bridis - AP

Posted on 06/14/2004 9:47:50 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AP) - A White House commission will recommend that NASA overhaul its Apollo-era relationships with private industries, giving corporations a broader role in upcoming space launches to ensure President Bush's goal of ultimately flying to Mars, according to documents obtained Monday.

The role of NASA "must be limited to only those areas where there is irrefutable demonstration that only government can perform the proposed activity," according to a summary obtained by The Associated Press that was prepared by the president's commission. Its final report is expected later this week.

The commission determined that NASA should recognize "a far larger presence of private industry in space operations with the specific goal of allowing private industry to assume the primary role of providing services to NASA, and most immediately in accessing low-earth orbit."

Experts said that conclusion clearly signals intentions to hand over nearly all space launches - except manned missions - to private corporations.

"It carves out the launch of astronauts," said George T. Whitesides, head of the National Space Society. "I'm sure there will be a lot of debate about that over the coming weeks."

Bush created the President's Commission on Implementation of U.S. Space Exploration Policy to help decide the best way to accomplish his new space vision, which includes resuming flights to the moon and Mars over the next few decades.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; reduce; role; space; spacelaunches; whitehousepanel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2004 9:47:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Rutan's first launch attempt at 62 miles and officially declared "space" is scheduled for next week.


2 posted on 06/14/2004 9:49:39 AM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; Gracey

Ping


3 posted on 06/14/2004 9:52:21 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Government is not the answer. Now where have i heard that before?


4 posted on 06/14/2004 9:54:18 AM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Here's what they ought to do, and I may have mentioned this before, maybe just a few thousand times: create the possibility of private property rights in outer space.

Private property creates the existence of the private sector and capitalism.

Private sector = private property

If you want the private sector in outer space, create private property out there.

5 posted on 06/14/2004 9:57:15 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Interesting idea. I don't have a problem with a company laying claim to any asteroid it can land a ship on. Theres wealth in space that's beyond our wildest dreams.


6 posted on 06/14/2004 10:03:02 AM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Million's worth of iron and nickel ore alone. Let alone any of the other elements floating around.


7 posted on 06/14/2004 10:03:59 AM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The role of NASA "must be limited to only those areas where there is irrefutable demonstration that only government can perform the proposed activity,"

It's only thirty years late.

Now to find someway of reforming the launch contractors, or breaking their stranglehold on the market.

8 posted on 06/14/2004 10:04:16 AM PDT by hopespringseternal (People should be banned for sophistry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
"It's only thirty years late."


Pathetic isn't it? 66 years from the wright brothers first flight to a landing on the moon. in the 40 years since we have a near useless fleet of space shuttles that shuttle very little and a space station of dubious value.
9 posted on 06/14/2004 10:08:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
There can be no private property without agreement of all, and all means the public sector. The public sector is gov't, kings, mayors, whatever. Private property exists under the public umbrella, and you must admit that.

The 1967 UN Treaty precludes public ownership of celestial resources, which makes no sense at all since by signing the treaty they have implicitly assumed public ownership. The net effect is that they have assumed public ownership and denied private ownership. You cannot have a claim to ownership of any asteroid or moon. Is that clear?

10 posted on 06/14/2004 10:19:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
create the possibility of private property rights in outer space.

Not only private property, but also contract out with the companie(s) to build the transportation system to get there.

The prototype should be how we got the transcontinental railroad. It was brilliant. The US government loaned the rail companies the money to build it. They gave the railroads some property, which is where their profit came from.

The government retained some land, that it sold and made money from (the land previously being worthless, because you couldn't travel to/from there with any serious tonnage). Then governments were formed from the population that moved to the new rail transportation areas, and taxes were derived from the new population.

In the end, the original loans for rail were repaid, with interest.

The railroads made money. The government made money. The people made money. Litteraly everybody won.

Do the same thing with the Moon/Mars/Asteroids. Anyone who can design a serious space transportation system should get the loan to build and operate it plus some percentage of the property that can now be accessed.

11 posted on 06/14/2004 10:21:00 AM PDT by narby (Bumpersticker: "Democrat = Internationalist ... Republican = American")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narby

The American railroad system was highly successful and might be the model for space development. We could go with the highly successful British system of crown charters, which strangely is still in use in this country, or we could go with leases like oil/gas leases. Phoebe is an ice moon. Worth its weight in gold? Hah! Nothing so cheap as gold. No, it is the most precious substance, as Solomon pointed out.


12 posted on 06/14/2004 10:37:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

UN is anti-private property, like any other communist organization.


13 posted on 06/14/2004 11:27:29 AM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

The US can withdraw from the Treaty. They should.


14 posted on 06/14/2004 11:38:11 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Easy, get your company chartered in Taiwan, land on the asteroid, and say "MINE"!

What would anyone do about it? :)


15 posted on 06/14/2004 11:53:01 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Unfortunately, most countries are signatory. Find a country that isn't, and you will find a country that can't enforce zoning laws in front of city hall.


16 posted on 06/14/2004 12:01:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; *Space; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; ...

Space Ping! This is the Space Ping List! Let me know if you want on or off this list!


17 posted on 06/14/2004 7:10:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

thats a good point that there will have to be a government in control for a private sector to start up. The wierd thing though is that we've never done anything quite like this before and its going to take a while for the world to work out how its going to work. since there isn't really anything contiguous about space its hard to specify who owns what and who is subject to what government. Inevitably, through war or rebellion or whatever, the space stations, asteroids and planetary bases are going to be ruled only by spacefaring nations. And what if a certain space colony or martian territory applies for statehood? How do you put that on the US map?

Although space is certainly going to become a private sector thing to a large extent, the government must stay involved and in benevolent control if we don't want our colonies to rebel.

Yes, I've been reading red mars.


18 posted on 06/14/2004 9:44:32 PM PDT by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; KevinDavis; All
Space Vision Misunderestimated***"The objective is everything," said Mr. Marburger said with delighted emphasis -- the moon, Mars and all the rest of the things under -- or at least in the gravitational sway of -- the sun. According to his science advisor, the president has accepted the notion that eventually, humans will incorporate accessible space into their economic zone.***
19 posted on 06/15/2004 3:01:11 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Taiwan isn't in the UN, so I doubt they've signed the UN's outer space treaty. Heck, it would be worth it just to stick a finger in the PRC's eye.

Regardless, if a company landed on an asteroid and started mining, who'd stop them? Does the treaty even have any enforcement mechanisms? I'd bet it is one of those "we'll go along because we're nice" treaties that fly out the window as soon as a good excuse comes along. What would the UN do, not like us even more?

Eh, fhqwghads, the UN can kiss my derriere. The universe is more important than a bunch of bureaucrats grousing from offices in the worlds ugliest building.


20 posted on 06/15/2004 5:09:40 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson