The question is how did the case get this far in the first place if it was thrown out on such a clear technicality?
See post 94.
Clearly explained.
The 9th Circuit is clearly not interested in any law...just legislating from the bench.
The case got this far because the 9th Circuit has an agenda. Dismissing the case on a "technicality" was the correct thing to do. If the courts would have ruled on the merits it would have encouraged others with "no standing" to bring cases on who knows what which ties the courts up. Good decision.