[Modernman]

The a-hole will be back to get those two words removed as sure as God made little green apples.

It won't be him, unless he gets custody of his daughter. It can be someobody else who does have custody of their kid, however.

SCOTUS did the right thing here. Whatever the merits of this case, this guy had no standing to sue.

I don't think this is the last we'll be hearing of this issue, though.

[Landru]

"It won't be him, unless he gets custody of his daughter. It can be someobody else who does have custody of their kid, however."

Yup, according to what the ACLU told ABC Radio News (spit}, that's exactly what's going to happen.
ACLU said, "They're Looking for the 'right' case to prosecute."

"SCOTUS did the right thing here. Whatever the merits of this case, this guy had no standing to sue."

Maybe not, but if Limbaugh's insights count for anything, he stated that aside from this minor technicallity, he thought it sounded as if some of the SCJ's were all set to side with the ACLU.

"I don't think this is the last we'll be hearing of this issue, though."

Of course it isn't, and to that we agree.

...the Liberal-Socialists are nothing, if not tenacious.