To: Fenris6
Pretending the WOT does not include nation states like Iraq that support terror networks is not intellectually honest.
It most definitely is intellectually honest. Bush himself said there wasn't a link between Saddam and 9-11. It's Al Quade we should be after. Remember Osama? OSAMA? He's the mastermind behind 9-11, and we haven't found him or caught him, unless you know something I don't.
To: churchillbuff
Fen: Pretending the WOT does not include nation states like Iraq that support terror networks is not intellectually honest. You: It most definitely is intellectually honest. Bush himself said there wasn't a link between Saddam and 9-11.
There you go again. You're being dishonest. Where did I mention 9-11? You can't even defend your posiiton - you have to resort to strawman. You are disingenuous. Thanks for making my point for me so quickly. Idiot.
202 posted on
06/14/2004 3:38:56 PM PDT by
Fenris6
To: churchillbuff
Saddam supported terrorists to the tune of $35 million/year. Saddam's Iraq was a terrorist state. If you believe that Saddam had no links to bin Laden, that is your opinion. It is an opinion that is NOT supported by facts. You have an opportunity to vote in November and change the country's CIC.
210 posted on
06/14/2004 7:37:51 PM PDT by
Chgogal
(Fellow Democrats, don't be stingy with Freedom and Liberty. Win won for the Gipper!)
To: churchillbuff
Everybody on earth knows something you don't.
211 posted on
06/14/2004 8:03:40 PM PDT by
arjay
("Are we a government that has a country, or a country that has a government?" Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson