For once, I wish you'd describe what we should have done after Afghanistan? The typical response from anti-Iraq war people is 'focus on Afghanistan' and yet even if we did get Bin Laden would that be it for you? Everything would just be solved after Afghanistan, right? Bush was supposed to just ignore Iraq and it's noncompliance with UN resolutions and his threats towards our country? Terrorism and threats such as 9/11 would supposedly stop after Afghanistan? It's a much broader problem and Bush is going about it the right way because things have got to change in the Middle East and Saddam Hussein being taken out is directly involved in the war on terrorism.
whaddya mean, "after Afghanistan" ? Afghanistan ain't over - - and we haven't caught Osama yet. REMEMBER OSAMA? Unlike Saddam, he actually had a central role in 9-11. REMEMBER 9-11? I think we ought to focus our fire on the guys who did 9-11. That's AL QUEDA. Saddam wasn't a part of Al Quade - unless the administration has been lying to us when it says that they haven't found a link.