Replies

If these people are considered unworthy of the GC Protections then spell that out, and admit, that in order to get info to save lives this is sometimes necessary. The problem is that nobody believes that putting a pair of underpants on somebody's head is going to get you the motherlode.

And evidently, we don't want the world to view us in this light, or we wouldn't be trying to distance ourselves from it. If we're only doing these types of things because our survival depends on it, why are we distancing ourselves from the actions, saying that they're shameful? Why can't we assert our superiority here?

What I'd like to know, is whose idea was it to photograph all this stuff? That is one of the warfare tactics sure to go down in History as the left of the bellcurve brigade stuff. What a bunch of idiots.

What I'd like to know, is whose idea was it to photograph all this stuff?

I believe that would be the brainiac named Charles Graner, ringleader and sicko extraordinaire.

The goon of Abu Ghraib

Just to underscore the answer to your question and present more evidence it was not condoned or authorized, the pictures were taken with *personal cameras*, not for any official use (obviously), but taken by the rogue group.