Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book Review of The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing The Principal Threat To Religious Freedom Today
IntellectualConservative.com ^ | June 13, 2004 | Alan Sears and Craig Osten

Posted on 06/13/2004 5:21:31 PM PDT by az4vlad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2004 5:21:34 PM PDT by az4vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

http://www.narth.com/docs/normalization.html

Presents an article about the "historical debate which culminated in the 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from the psychiatric manual."

National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
http://www.narth.com/index.html

The Three Myths About Homosexuality
http://www.narth.com/menus/myths.html

One quote from "Myths" which is frightening:
"A 1992 study in Pediatrics found that 25.9% of 12-year-olds are uncertain if they are gay or straight. The teen years are critical to the question of self-labeling, so the facts must be presented in our schools in a fair and balanced manner. "


2 posted on 06/13/2004 5:40:28 PM PDT by Maria S ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."George W. Bush 1/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

Mentally defaulting on the perpetuation of self is a dirt-road cul-de-sac.


3 posted on 06/13/2004 5:41:19 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

I know quite a few gay people, some are family members of mine, and NONE of them has a gay agenda. They live quietly and never even mention being gay. They don't go to protests, they don't hold hands or kiss in public. I think the quiet law abiding ones are the majority. They certainly are in the cases of the ones I know well. They keep to themselves. They have no desire to mess with religious freedom or even marriage. They only ask to be left alone.


4 posted on 06/13/2004 5:42:09 PM PDT by buffyt (There is no limit to what a man can do - as long as he doesn't care who gets the credit. R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

Must be like all the good Muslims. Funny how you rarely hear them speak out against the jihadis.

It's actually a bad analogy and I won't use it anymore, because I'm sure there ARE good, decent Muslims who just want to worship God in their traditional way and don't want to force Islam on everyone else.

The problem with your statement:

You're extrapolating the few people you personally know and then making a generalization from that. In order to find out if your generalization is right, you need to read and study about the "gay" agenda. Have you? There's more information on FR in one place than just about anywhere else on the 'net.

If you had studied (without prior bias) you would see that there is, indeed, a radical "gay" agenda.

In fact, the evidence is voluminous that there is indeed a radical homosexual plan - as evidenced in "After the Ball" - written in the late 80s by a two homosexuals - the influence society to suit them.

If you don't want to inform youself, you're welcome to stay ill-informed. But your opinion will reveal you to be the homosexual supporter that I am afraid you are.

Have you ever read any articles or books by Tammy Bruce? If you haven't, do FR search. She's a homosexual who admits the existence of the "gay" agenda and decries it, for the very reasons I do.


5 posted on 06/13/2004 5:54:33 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - Just bookmarked this; don't have time to read it at the moment. Looks very very good. I'm going to have to get this book.


OK, we need to get it straightened out - is there a radical "gay" agenda or not? If anyone spends some time reading the Categorical Index of articles on homosexuality that Scripter has organized and EdReform puts up links to, they will know the answer.

If anyone wants on/off this pinglist, pingify me!


Public Service Announcement:

http://www.mikegabbard.com/ - a REAL conservative running for US Congress in Hawaii. He could be a real force for conservative values if he wins. He also is very good at working with others without compromising or losing his cool. A rare character.


6 posted on 06/13/2004 5:58:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I'm sure there are good, decent people of all religions who just want to workship God in their traditional way and don't want to force their religion on everyone else, but do you suppose the gays think there is a radical religious agenda of suppression and exclusion?


7 posted on 06/13/2004 6:03:15 PM PDT by imfleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: imfleck

It is clear to anyone who has read much of the info here on FR (or where it was originally sourced) that the homosexual agenda pushers - whether they be practitioners or merely their supporters - want to dismbowel religion or change the nature of the message.

Homosexual activists have clearly stated themselves that they want to dismantle the moral foundation of society and change the very meaning of marriage, family, and what is acceptable in sexual behavior. They have stated that they want to change children's minds about sexual orientation from kindergarten and are actively pursuing that goal now, with "gay" friendly cirrcula, clubs, special classes, teaching seminars and so on.

Now what was your question?


8 posted on 06/13/2004 6:09:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; buffyt
I also know some homosexuals and lesbians. One male couple I know have told me that they're very turned off by the promiscuity and exhibitionism they see in the homosexual community. But other homosexual acquaintances of mine revel in their outlaw lifestyle, preaching sexual liberation. Other homosexual acquaintances of mine have succumbed to AIDS.

An important point about the "gay agenda" is that early in the homosexual movement, circa 1970, activists were already promoting what has proved to be their most powerful weapon: "coming out of the closet". The logic is inescapable -- by being willing to publicly declare their sexual "orientation", they could convince themselves if not other people that it is not a shameful thing to be homosexual. But the real effectiveness of this strategy is that it made people think of homosexuals, not as a furtive, mentally disturbed category of people, but instead as their neighbors, friends and relatives. Research shows that people who are personally acquainted with homosexuals or lesbians are more likely to be personally tolerant or accepting of homosexuals and lesbians, and more likely to support same-sex marriage and other legal or political goals of homosexual activists.

9 posted on 06/13/2004 6:19:32 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

"...do you suppose the gays think there is a radical religious agenda of suppression and exclusion?"


10 posted on 06/13/2004 6:24:38 PM PDT by imfleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

later


11 posted on 06/13/2004 6:50:51 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("You shall call on your gods, and I will call on the LORD. The God who answers with fire is God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imfleck

If homosexuals think that there is a radical religious agenda of suppression and exclusion, that is evidence that they are seriously incapable of rational thought, know nothing of history, don't understand hygiene, the spread of illness, the inherent dangers of same sex sodomy and promiscuity, and are focused solely on their sexual proclivities to the exclusion of everything and everyone else.

If someone actually thinks that, he or she is actually very mentally ill. To have as the entire focus of one's life the method whereby one achieves orgasm (and a very nasty way at that) and to view everything in the world through the lens of that method of achieving orgasm, is utterly selfish, miserable, and by its very nature, the narrowest and most exclusionist of viewpoints.


12 posted on 06/13/2004 8:42:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
Bump
To read later
13 posted on 06/13/2004 8:45:06 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Sure do ;) Why did all pop taste better then M'Dear? ;)

Darned but you are right about that. Drinks were colder, lasted longer and calories/carbs and sugar didn't matter. Cruising the hamburger joints and going to "record hops" was all we cared about. I wish our children and grandchildren had gotten the same kind of kinder gentler world. Bum deal for them and for us!

14 posted on 06/13/2004 9:03:44 PM PDT by MamaDearest (It's not how many breaths you take in your lifetime, but how many breathtaking moments you live!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Bump


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)


Culture of Vice


The Stamp of Normality

15 posted on 06/14/2004 8:00:53 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad; *Catholic_list; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; ...
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list


16 posted on 06/14/2004 10:04:54 AM PDT by NYer (I would not believe the Gospel unless moved thereto by the Church. "- St. Augustine of Hippo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

While my experience with homosexuals is similar to yours, this does not invalidate the work of the authors of the book.

If you think that their work is flawed, you have to prove it--and given their definitions of the terms, it looks a lot like they are correct.


17 posted on 06/14/2004 10:30:00 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
I have known several homosexuals. Each one had family problems. None of them openly promoted it in a political way, but they all supported the gay agenda in some quiet way. They all want to have their perversions accepted as virtuous.

I do not see why it matters if one openly promotes the agenda or one quietly promotes it through irregular relationships. Either way, it is a problem for them and our civilization.
18 posted on 06/14/2004 10:37:57 AM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: imfleck

Gays may think that because the truth is at odds with sin. Anytime someone immersed in a particular vice hears the truth they think it is hate. Truth is hate, to those who hate the truth.


19 posted on 06/14/2004 10:40:55 AM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: buffyt; az4vlad; JohnHuang2; MeekOneGOP; shaggy eel; little jeremiah; *Homosexual Agenda; ...

<< Must be like all the good Muslims. Funny how you rarely hear them speak out against the jihadis.

It's actually a bad analogy and I won't use it anymore .... >>

No it is not, it is the perfect analogy.

And that's too bad because it fits like a glove.

My sodomist friends, those, that is, who having so far lucked out in the permitting someone to give them HIV/AIDS crapshoot -- and are still alive -- are also sitting out the terroristic Sodonazi assault on our nation -- and on our Civilization -- just as are the several hundred million Islamonazis with whom they are effectively very very very closely allied.

And bear in mind that much much much more evil is allowed, facilitated, enabled and effected by those who do nothing but sit and wait than could be perpetrated in ten lifetimes apiece by Human History's Hitlers, Hirohitos, Hillary KKKli'toons, Ho Chi Mins, J F'in' Kohnkerrys, Pol Pots, Mao Tze Tungs, Marxs, Lenins and Joe Stalins.

In the fight to the finish for our very survival in which both our Nation and our Civilization are presently engaged there are no shades of gray and they are either with US -- or they ARE the enemy.


20 posted on 06/14/2004 11:15:13 AM PDT by Brian Allen (Did you hear that my beloved FRiend died, today? -- President Ronald Wilson Reagan 1911 - 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson