Skip to comments.
Photos of Saturn's largest moon show badly pitted surface
Austin American Statesman ^
| June 13, 2004
| Thomas H. Maugh II
Posted on 06/13/2004 8:33:37 AM PDT by kennedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: SaveTheChief; Phsstpok
Actually, Mimas is just that.
Mimas, one of Saturn's moons.
To: Crazieman
See that hole ? That was the birthplace of our moon
22
posted on
06/13/2004 9:38:55 AM PDT
by
Truth666
To: SGCOS
Looks to me like Cocoa Puffs.Or maybe Kix, given the color. But yeah, you are on to something.
23
posted on
06/13/2004 9:40:26 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Ronald Wilson Reagan (1911-2004))
To: steplock
What do you expect from an Austin paper[?] Ah, I see. The Austin American Statesman. Calling that liberal rag, "fishwrap" insults rotten fish.
24
posted on
06/13/2004 9:41:05 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
(Woe be unto any liberal who dares bad-mouth the Reagans -- or our military -- in my presence!)
To: NautiNurse
Whew! Those are some bad lookin' rocks. Don't think I'd want to inhabit that place.
25
posted on
06/13/2004 9:49:20 AM PDT
by
GVnana
To: kennedy
I don't see any blemishes.
26
posted on
06/13/2004 10:07:28 AM PDT
by
OSHA
(I refuse to be called uncooperative.)
To: kennedy
The problem is that the idiot reporters can't even copy simply facts from NASA correctly. The NASA statement describes Phoebe as the largest "outer" moon of Saturn. The dult reporter said, duh I don't know what that means so instead of researching it I'll just drop the word outer and look smart duh. If you are looking for scientific accuracy from places other than the source or a publication that does not at least have a focus in that area, then you are asking to get incorrect information.
Of course I didn't RTFA, but I'd send an email to the reporter and to the editor and give them an education. Make sure you talk down to them and inform them that you learned this in 3rd grade. Maybe that will kickstart what little spark of self respect they have.
27
posted on
06/13/2004 10:16:41 AM PDT
by
SengirV
To: Truth666
Don't tell us you're really medved a Velikovskian!
28
posted on
06/13/2004 10:17:14 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(A public service post.)
To: Crazieman
The Mimas "my God, we've found the Deathstar" incident at JPL when that picture was first released is what made me see the similarities (used by Jerry Pournelle and Larry Niven in their novel 'Footfall" from their own memories as invited guests at the event).
I read that Arthur C Clarke described it almost exactly like this in one of his books years before they actually got a picture. He supposedly said he didn't know how he got it right, it just was a good description of a moon like this when he needed one in his book. The story may be apocraphyl, but I still like it.
29
posted on
06/13/2004 10:18:58 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: OSHA
Little mountains though
30
posted on
06/13/2004 10:24:08 AM PDT
by
al baby
To: GVgirl
Don't think I'd want to inhabit that place.New photo taken by Cassini--close up of Phoebe surface
31
posted on
06/13/2004 10:29:51 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
To: al baby
you could have waited a few seconds longer before that screen grab!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
32
posted on
06/13/2004 10:32:46 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,this is like liberal logic,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
To: Mr. K
last time i posted something to crazy i got booted for 3 days i gotta be careful
33
posted on
06/13/2004 10:36:29 AM PDT
by
al baby
To: Phsstpok
Actually, the Deathstar has previously been located orbiting Saturn. It is the moon Mimas:
34
posted on
06/13/2004 11:39:30 AM PDT
by
kennedy
To: kennedy
You're right. See my post 34
35
posted on
06/13/2004 11:40:37 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: NautiNurse
Ahh! Now THAT'S more like it!
36
posted on
06/13/2004 11:42:37 AM PDT
by
GVnana
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: GreenHornet
Yeah. It's not just pitted, it's badly pitted. We simply must enact legislation that would protect this endangered ecosystem from further damage! At the present rate of deterioration, there might be no moons of Saturn left for our children's children.
I am wondering how much pitting it takes to qualify as BADLY pitted. Is it simply too much pitting, or was the pitting actually poorly executed? Is it merely too pitted in the minds of round-planet activists, who would consider a lumpy-bumpy moon to be aesthetically unattractive? And who gets to determine what constitutes attractiveness for moons of Saturn? Shouldn't the people of Saturn get to vote on that? Why should Earth be the sole arbiter of what is attractive or beautiful for moons?
Badly pitted. That sounds a little harsh. Let's use pleasantly asymmetrical. That sounds less judgemental.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson