Posted on 06/13/2004 6:24:17 AM PDT by Kerry Crusher
Hillary Clinton. Ted Kennedy. Howard Dean. The United Nations. Al Gore. They, in the words of David Kay, were all wrong. But because he is the Democrat nominee for President of the United States, John Kerry bears the greatest burden.
These useless idiots have committed a blunder of historic proportions. They decelerated the Bush administration’s “rush to war” against Saddam Hussein. And now, according to the United Nations (yes, the United Nations) Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction are out there, on the black market, or perhaps already in the hands of anti-American terrorist.
Big media has largely ignored the new evidence, but it is compelling. The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) briefed the Security Council recently on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.
Which means, while John Kerry and friends stalled, halted, hemmed, hawed, and demanded the Bush administration go to the United Nations just one more time to get permission from France to invade Saddam’s Iraq, the Butcher of Baghdad was secreting out weapons of mass destruction (or at least their component parts).
Where are the WMD’s now? God only knows. Though, at least one shell armed with sarin gas exploded in Iraq. Most likely, the WMD’s are in Syria, where they quickly will end up in the hands of al Qaida. In short, they’re on the Black Market.
Between Stephen Hayes research into the Iraq-al Qaida connection and the UN’s recent admission that Saddam did, indeed, have WMD’s, it is irrefutable that the Bush administration’s motives for invading Iraq were as pure now as when they stated them as early as 2002. Not that we’re likely to see an apology from Big Media for their shockingly irresponsible attacks on the president over the last three months, all of which is based on lies.
Okay, so Big Media will never cut President Bush a break. And we’re long past expecting them to. But how will they treat the useless idiots who allows WMD’s to get into the hands of anti-American terrorist with whom we are literally at war? Ho do these “peace at any price” liberals sleep at night?
Ballistic missile sites != WMD. You and I and anyone else with common sense knows the purpose of these sites, but it's not direct evidence.
Also, don't forget that there are 11 months between May 2003 and February 2004. That site could have been dismantled a week after the May photo was taken. We don't know.
going towards Syria?
going towards Syria?
just saw on Fox that a meteorite crashed thru a roof in New Zealand...
Thats the second one in three days in NZ plus the one in Central America, Washington state and others yet we are told that the comet poses no threat.
Well, these sites were not ballistic missle sites exclusively, according to the World Herald article we linked up to. Even the UN sees them as WMD developmental locations, now. Or dual use, anywho.
Love your tagline, and agree 100%.
"And this draws into question why Kay said there were no weapons. Very confusing."
Ah, but he didn't. He said they hadn't found large stockpiles of existing weapons - but plenty of other things including the network for making them. Funny how what was reported sounded different, hey?
Of course they did. We all figured that the stall tactics were to give Saddam time to hide the evidence. That's what the french and Russian stalling was for. I'm still convinced that Libya's nuclear program was what was sent to him from Iraq.
You are right. He also never actually said: "We were all wrong." He said: "We were almost all wrong." and he left open the probability we would ultimately find Saddam's WMD's. Hmph.
My point is, unless CNN gets live footage of Saddam himself sitting there gassing people, these people aren't going to be satisfied.
Unfortunaely, you're probably right.
1 attack) Invade Syria(Lebanon), bug every Mosque in America.
2 attack) Strengthen Iran's indiginent "anti-terrorists" with "advisors" and other help.
3 attack) Strengthen Indonesia's "anti-terrorists"..
4 attack) Cauterize Mecca and Medina..
5 attack) Seize Saudi Arabia and all Saudi assets worldwide. Deport to Iraq and Afganistan all newly impoverished Saudis, export all foreign nationals home.
6 attack) -To be decided-
CNN just reported it's: BUSH'S FAULT!
LOL!
My guess is they are nocturnal they sleep during the day so they can sneek up on the sheep at night !
so whaddya think? asteroids or Iran?
I would pray to God thats already being done !
But but but but the TV guy keeps telling me there are no weapons of mass destruction! How can this be? You're lying to us, trying to get us to believe that evil conservative line so we can go in and steal all the country's oil and put panties on their heads. Vile rightie!
I think Iran is on our radar if Israel decides to take out the reactor. If Israel decides to attack we will have to contain both Syria and Iran and the only way to do that is with massive show of force. Also, Iran and Russia are alies, so there could be more threat than just Iran. We could be sitting on a powder keg of unprecedented violence not seen since WWII. On the other hand , maybe the carriers are just out for a sunday afternoon cruise.
That's the first thing I noticed, too. We owned Baghdad in May 2003. If there were a large missile site that could be seen in satellite imagery, our troops would have taken it. This doesn't make sense.
Something i find a bit strange is the U.N. denying WMD until the "oil for food" scandle submerges then all of a sudden OMG there were WMD'S and they were there the whole time now all of a sudden "oil for food" is........
virgin olive oil on a salad !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.