Posted on 06/13/2004 6:24:17 AM PDT by Kerry Crusher
Ballistic missile sites != WMD. You and I and anyone else with common sense knows the purpose of these sites, but it's not direct evidence.
Also, don't forget that there are 11 months between May 2003 and February 2004. That site could have been dismantled a week after the May photo was taken. We don't know.
going towards Syria?
going towards Syria?
just saw on Fox that a meteorite crashed thru a roof in New Zealand...
Thats the second one in three days in NZ plus the one in Central America, Washington state and others yet we are told that the comet poses no threat.
Well, these sites were not ballistic missle sites exclusively, according to the World Herald article we linked up to. Even the UN sees them as WMD developmental locations, now. Or dual use, anywho.
Love your tagline, and agree 100%.
"And this draws into question why Kay said there were no weapons. Very confusing."
Ah, but he didn't. He said they hadn't found large stockpiles of existing weapons - but plenty of other things including the network for making them. Funny how what was reported sounded different, hey?
Of course they did. We all figured that the stall tactics were to give Saddam time to hide the evidence. That's what the french and Russian stalling was for. I'm still convinced that Libya's nuclear program was what was sent to him from Iraq.
You are right. He also never actually said: "We were all wrong." He said: "We were almost all wrong." and he left open the probability we would ultimately find Saddam's WMD's. Hmph.
My point is, unless CNN gets live footage of Saddam himself sitting there gassing people, these people aren't going to be satisfied.
Unfortunaely, you're probably right.
1 attack) Invade Syria(Lebanon), bug every Mosque in America.
2 attack) Strengthen Iran's indiginent "anti-terrorists" with "advisors" and other help.
3 attack) Strengthen Indonesia's "anti-terrorists"..
4 attack) Cauterize Mecca and Medina..
5 attack) Seize Saudi Arabia and all Saudi assets worldwide. Deport to Iraq and Afganistan all newly impoverished Saudis, export all foreign nationals home.
6 attack) -To be decided-
CNN just reported it's: BUSH'S FAULT!
LOL!
My guess is they are nocturnal they sleep during the day so they can sneek up on the sheep at night !
so whaddya think? asteroids or Iran?
I would pray to God thats already being done !
But but but but the TV guy keeps telling me there are no weapons of mass destruction! How can this be? You're lying to us, trying to get us to believe that evil conservative line so we can go in and steal all the country's oil and put panties on their heads. Vile rightie!
I think Iran is on our radar if Israel decides to take out the reactor. If Israel decides to attack we will have to contain both Syria and Iran and the only way to do that is with massive show of force. Also, Iran and Russia are alies, so there could be more threat than just Iran. We could be sitting on a powder keg of unprecedented violence not seen since WWII. On the other hand , maybe the carriers are just out for a sunday afternoon cruise.
That's the first thing I noticed, too. We owned Baghdad in May 2003. If there were a large missile site that could be seen in satellite imagery, our troops would have taken it. This doesn't make sense.
Something i find a bit strange is the U.N. denying WMD until the "oil for food" scandle submerges then all of a sudden OMG there were WMD'S and they were there the whole time now all of a sudden "oil for food" is........
virgin olive oil on a salad !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.