Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Was that movie geared towards 6-year-olds? I don't think so.

Well, under the Hayes Office, which had power in 1959, movies exhibited in the U.S. were required to conform to standards slightly looser than "G", but more stringent than "PG", so no films were supposed to be particularly unsuitable for children. For men to dress up as women to disguise themselves was thus apparently considered less objectionable than for a man and woman to have a single kiss last more than 3 seconds (unless the man was a soldier or sailor departing for The War--some of those film kisses were allowed to last a lot longer).

BTW, note that cross-dressing for theatrical or humorous purposes goes back a long time, and was not considered to have anything to do with sexual deviancy.

38 posted on 06/13/2004 1:47:36 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

That's nice. Only, we are talking about a familiar fictional character dressed in WOMEN'S THONG UNDERWEAR. We are also talking about a male dressed as a women who drools all over another man. This for the preschool and grade school crowd. I think it's inappropriate. Oh yeah...and some of the female characters were wanting to see Shrek naked and commented on his tight butt. Relate that back to the good old days.


39 posted on 06/13/2004 2:27:41 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson