To: Lazamataz
If they were the only example, then I wouldn't generalize. But they're not. What happened to me happened to over 50% of the people I knew as a child. You think we didn't compare notes?
Here's a mental exercise for you: try to come up with a divorce scenario that is not dependent on a moral failure by one party or both. (It can't be done - the breach of a solemn oath itself is a moral failure.)
74 posted on
06/12/2004 12:58:30 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(No Gays = No AIDS; No Arabs = No Terror)
To: thoughtomator
Here's a mental exercise for you: try to come up with a divorce scenario that is not dependent on a moral failure by one party or both.Precisely my point. We don't know that Rush is the person with the moral failure in this scenario. You do concede that a split CAN occur with one party being largely blameless?
78 posted on
06/12/2004 1:00:50 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: thoughtomator
...Here's a mental exercise for you: try to come up with a divorce scenario that is not dependent on a moral failure by one party or both. (It can't be done - the breach of a solemn oath itself is a moral failure.)....
How about the scenario where 50% of the country loathes you and will do anything to destroy you because they perceive you the enemy and the other 49.99999% won't protect you.
Rush gets the adulation and reward but his whole live and Marta's are open to any sort of speculation. Scratch yourself wrong and you'll be on Time magazine. I for one am glad that he continues to fight.
212 posted on
06/13/2004 4:25:01 PM PDT by
Joe_October
(Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson