Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh, Wife Set to Divorce
Newsmax ^ | 6/11/04 | newsmax

Posted on 06/12/2004 11:46:05 AM PDT by NotchJohnson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last
To: krb

I've been married 24 years. It works in practice, too. But it helps to marry somebody with similar values.


21 posted on 06/12/2004 12:08:56 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gracey

Is the 10 year thing also true in Florida? From what I've read, it's true in California. Just wondering. Thank you.


22 posted on 06/12/2004 12:10:04 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: ScreamingFist
Wealth residistubution you mean. Often there is a great disparity in motivation and income between the spouses. Divorce will redistribute wealth without regard to merit. (Especially in community property states)

Furthermore, there is a cavalcade of attorneys who will also benefit from the dissolution of the marriage.

A good article on retribution of assets as will as the effect of pre-nupituals is: http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2709223
24 posted on 06/12/2004 12:11:39 PM PDT by AUH2OY2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Is his first wife campaigning for him, or is shewith most of his strike boat buddies?


25 posted on 06/12/2004 12:13:59 PM PDT by Military family member (Proud Pacers fan...still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

Many a day he has saved me from kicking a liberal"

I wish I could say that...but kicking liberals is just too much fun.


26 posted on 06/12/2004 12:15:11 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"It's getting harder and harder to reconcile his behavior with his rhetoric."

I listen to him for his political analysis, not marriage counseling.

27 posted on 06/12/2004 12:17:21 PM PDT by gorush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Ten years is the definition of "long-term marriage". On the completion of that period, a sort of tenure sets in.

Purely arbitrary, of course. There is nothing intrinsically magical about ten years. Most really bad marriages break up in the first three to five years, strained marriages by seven or eight years, and after that, if the couple have not learned to be fully loving, at least they have settled into a wary acceptance of the other's presence.


28 posted on 06/12/2004 12:17:45 PM PDT by alloysteel (Win one for the Gipper. He's watching, you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Kerry was in Vietnam?
I would have never known...


29 posted on 06/12/2004 12:18:20 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NotchJohnson

Well, it happens...every day! Very good and bad people end their relationships in divorce. It's just part of life.

I have 2 priors, both were nice ladies. My 3rd has put up with me for nearly 32 beautiful years. She is my best friend and my soul mate. We have raised two wonderful children and grown older together, though she is just as beautiful and kind as she was the day I met her and we fell in love.

Our honeymoon has never stopped, not for even one day. She is the reason my heart bothers to take it's next beat. Like Reagan, I miss this Gift from God........ every time she leaves the room. Some guys tease me about this, but I gave up sport fishing, because all I did on the boat was miss the time I could have been spending with my Bride.

Too bad about Rush, but it happens even to the best of us. For me, it's not about the promise or oath one makes, it's about being best friends, love, respect, admiration, kindness, building memories and much, much more.


30 posted on 06/12/2004 12:18:24 PM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I'm going on 9 years since my only divorce. Haven't remarried and don't know if I ever will.


31 posted on 06/12/2004 12:19:28 PM PDT by Rebelbase (AKA gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

I searched this before I posted.


32 posted on 06/12/2004 12:19:58 PM PDT by NotchJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"Rush Limbaugh, Wife Set to Divorce"

I sorry to hear about that, but it's a personal matter and none of my business.

Nothing to see here, let's move on....
33 posted on 06/12/2004 12:21:01 PM PDT by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of charity that you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gracey

In FL the rule of thumb (there is no real written rule) is that five years gives you rehabilatative alimony and 12 years gets you permanent. ALTHOUGH I do remember one case where permanent alimony was awarded after a few months marriage because the woman gave up a once in a lifetime opportunity that was NEVER to return and the husband was significantly wealthy and they had met through unusual circumstances.

(there is also a case in FL which says that refusal of marital relations can be deemed marital abuse. That was in a case where the wife was trying to get more money due to an affair and the husband said he had to seek sex outside the marriage by maintaining a mistress. The courts sided with the husband.)

The courts treat marriage as a cashout value object like an insurance policy. It is very unrealistic. For example, I don't know what she did for a living before, but is it reasonable to have her expect to be paid to live in a 20 million dollar home? Something reasonable perhaps but what is reasonable and to whom?

She also will have new assets which should be taken into account. Unless she signed over her literary rights, she has the asset of her time with rush. The anticipated proceeds from that inevitable tell all should be factored into her settlement. IOW she is not without means to provide for herself.

In FL judges are very reluctant to make any alimony permantent. permanent alimony keeps a case on their docket. Fortunatly in FL there is mandatory mediation and 90+% of all cases settle at that stage.


34 posted on 06/12/2004 12:21:13 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Thank you for your reply.


35 posted on 06/12/2004 12:23:00 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NotchJohnson

Makes me wonder, if this isn't his initiation, if she isn't at the age where she's going through the change and now suddenly without reason hates her husband simply for existing, not alone the tons of other baggage that has been dropped on the marriage the past couple of years.


36 posted on 06/12/2004 12:23:34 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
She's probably got some hefty baggage of her own as well.

I hope Marta's heavy baggage doesn't include drug abuse and alleged doctor shopping.

37 posted on 06/12/2004 12:23:34 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

***I'd just like to say that "I need Rush". Many a day he has saved me from kicking a liberal. He does it for me.***

LOL!

I know I don't have the right to judge Marta, but just maybe she went along for the ride when things were good and then bailed when they got tough.


38 posted on 06/12/2004 12:23:45 PM PDT by kitkat (PLEASE STEAL THIS TAG: "The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: ScreamingFist
...it's America's #1 source of wealth distribution.

Not if the Democrats had their say.

40 posted on 06/12/2004 12:25:08 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Ronald Reagan - Greatest President of the 20th Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson