Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: Kim Jong-il's Secret Directive(building a next big surprise?)
www.independent.co.kr ^ | 06/11/04 | Yoon Kyong-won

Posted on 06/11/2004 10:43:15 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: sharktrager
Re #19

N. Korean regime does acknowledge the difficult situation the country is in. They officially call it "March of Suffering." They blame their enemies for their problems, though. That is their official line

N. Korean industry is in moribund state except defense industry. They cannot produce basic products such as cement enough to meet their needs.

This directive is sent to party officials. There are many of them. It is not restricted to a handful of confident es. Due to shortage of all necessities including foods, it is not hard to get hold of the document like this if you are willing to shell out some money. Bribe is working surprisingly well these days in N. Korea. That is one of the concerns Kim Jong-il has. In another directive, which has not been posted here yet, he deplored that many military secrets are being leaked these days. Bribe plays a role in this, I believe.

21 posted on 06/12/2004 7:24:32 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
Second, I do not buy that large quantities of cement are imported. It is something that requires almost no technology to produce, and, due to weight, would be more expensive to import than to make, including the construction of a plant.

The United States imports cement because of regulatory restrictions on mining and processing. Yep, that's how lame we're coming to be.

22 posted on 06/12/2004 7:36:41 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: risk; TigerLikesRooster

I agree. Saddam tried to bluff his way out of war by hinting at his WMDs and it failed. Pakistan has tested them. Libya figured out it would lose the race and quit.


23 posted on 06/12/2004 8:15:54 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Re #23

In my view, N. Korea is not bluffing. She will have nukes if the current regime continues in N. Korea. She may pretend that she is further along than she actually is, in order to gain some advantage at the negotiation table. Or she may pretend that she stopped working on nukes for the same reason. However, either way, she will get them eventually.

24 posted on 06/12/2004 8:37:47 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: TigerLikesRooster; risk

I don't think NK is totally bluffing either. But I doubt they can deliver a nuke on a longdong even to Guam. A nuke is one thing, one that fits on an accurate long range missile is another.


26 posted on 06/12/2004 8:44:28 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Re #26

If you give Kim Jong-il time and money, he will try.

27 posted on 06/12/2004 8:50:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; TigerLikesRooster; Cincinatus' Wife; mylife; arthurus
It's a very good thing that President Reagan ignored the mathematicians and went ahead with the SDI. Maybe we'll have half a chance to save L.A. or Anchorage when Kim Jung Il decides to take it all down with himself. The naysayers were upset with SDI because it might not be 100% reliable during a Russian-style onslaught. Even without the ability for Brilliant Pebbles to withstand a concentrated barrage, it would still be much better to have than not during a rogue state attack as we are almost certain to see in our lifetimes. With Hollywood or San Francisco in flames, the liberals would be the first to complain that we hadn't ignored them.
28 posted on 06/12/2004 8:55:27 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: risk; TigerLikesRooster

There are many elements of a race in this equation.


29 posted on 06/12/2004 10:31:42 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

You are quite mistaken if you think that cement requires "almost no technology" to produce. It actually requires considerable technology. It is not particularly advanced technology, but it is precise and it is specific.

Furthermore, portland cement is regularly traded between nations, for a variety of valid economic reasons. I can remember importing many tons of cement into Indonesia from Thailand becasue it was cheaper to obtain from there (at our location) that it would have been from any Indonesian source.

I suspect that you may be using the term "cement" when you really are thinking of portland cement concrete, something that is always locally made, even if the cemnt component is not.


30 posted on 06/12/2004 10:57:10 AM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
http://www.cement.org/Shortage%20Update.pdf

The above link will take you to a story from this week about regional portland cement supplies and shortages in the United States. The US is producing about 85 million tons of cement per year and has averaged 106 million tons consumption per year in this decade.

Besides, doesn't it require a lot of coal or gas to produce the cement? Just how much spare energy capacity can North Korea have?

31 posted on 06/12/2004 11:21:39 AM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Re your post 30. You ought to try re-reading who posted what.


32 posted on 06/12/2004 11:33:26 AM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Re your post to me, I believe you meant that for sharktrager in post 19.


33 posted on 06/12/2004 11:52:58 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Dear Carry,

You're right. Sorry... It was your italicized reference that I was commenting on. I should have referenced back to the original item.


34 posted on 06/12/2004 5:01:00 PM PDT by John Valentine ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

No problemo.


35 posted on 06/12/2004 5:58:37 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Stand by, please.

I've been in a world of busy these last few days overseas. In fact I was overseas all during the Reagan farewell and could see little. I'll catch up when back stateside and also sign in with something on this topic. --AIT

36 posted on 06/12/2004 6:02:28 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (***Since The Iraq War & Transition Period Began, NORTH KOREA HAS MANUFACTURED (8) NUCLEAR WEAPONS***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The information above is not specific enough to qualify as an effective disinformation of the kind suggested by you. Besides, N. Koreans usually achieve the same effects through open dramatic public display, such as missile test or diverting plutonium, which triggers the whole range of worst-case speculation from their adversaries.

This information is moot. The game is not one of bunkers but one of missiles of the type that were lobbed over the heads of millions of Japanese.

Who really cares if the NK leadership run scared into a doomsday spiderhole? If the weapons are out of the equation, the "coo-coo for cocoa puffs" leaders are completely impotent and can be ignored until their food, water and air runs out.

37 posted on 06/14/2004 7:44:14 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Re #37

Right type of missiles in a open area create far less problem than ones in a underground fortified installation which outsiders may not detect.

38 posted on 06/14/2004 7:50:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Right type of missiles in a open area create far less problem than ones in a underground fortified installation which outsiders may not detect.

Even so, "the game" is one of missiles and not one of bunkers. The missiles can be dispersed or holed-up but the targeting is still focused on the missile.

One could make a really big bunker, fill it with sawdust as a "designated target" and have your missiles everwhere else. Your opponent would have to expend a lot of effort destroying that bunker unless they're 100% certain its missile-free.

39 posted on 06/14/2004 8:05:05 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson