Skip to comments.
DJ Fired for Celebrating Reagan's Death
DJ Fired for Celebrating Reagan's Death
MyWay ^
| 6-11-04
| SPENCER SHROYER
Posted on 06/11/2004 10:14:03 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: dpa5923
Sorry, I got a little verbose. Don't be.
41
posted on
06/12/2004 8:24:29 AM PDT
by
null and void
(History is not a tale of self-restraint, and change is accelerating all the time.)
To: LPDen
Ugh, my first thread of the day. Nauseating.
42
posted on
06/12/2004 8:55:33 AM PDT
by
Annie03
(donate at www.terrisfight.org)
To: mhking
Fairbanks is heavily populated with these walking gonads.
43
posted on
06/12/2004 9:28:39 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: null and void
Please explain the error to him by hand... Nah, he's a loser and knows it.
44
posted on
06/12/2004 9:29:53 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: atomic conspiracy
A professional student chimes in with his ignorance.
To: jocon307
"He's a little long in the tooth to be an undergrad?"
Yes he is, I refer to those types as professional students. The real world sccares the cr*p out of them. They require training wheels over the course of their entire life.
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: trussell
Just in case the Admin Mod deletes your post with a link to the DUmb people's site. Here's the non-DU gist of it...
Another lefty got fired for the same attitude...here is where some of this story is:
This is how DUer Misanthrope got fired yesterday...
I noted that the DUmbies are HOWLING for blood over this.
Pit-y...
48
posted on
06/12/2004 12:09:23 PM PDT
by
null and void
(History is not a tale of self-restraint, and change is accelerating all the time.)
To: null and void
I guess if the idiot didn't want to lose his job, he could have just obeyed station protocol! Makes me
![](http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/23/23_29_132.gif)
somebody alerted his station manager about what he was fixing to do!
49
posted on
06/12/2004 12:33:55 PM PDT
by
trussell
(If stupidity was actually painful, some people would be on a permanent lidocane drip.)
To: little jeremiah
I'm wondering if this individual (assuming he is an individual) is a homosexual - he calls himself "Spider bui" which looks like a misprint. Homosexuals often spell "boy" as "boi". Plus he faults President Reagan for the spread of AIDS, which is the homo-speak line. Dude. This a bit much. he berated Reagan, who died June 5, for his foreign policy in Latin America, Iraq and Afghanistan, and for his response to the AIDS epidemic.
"Berating a person for their response" IS NOT "faulting someone for the spread of AIDS". Try a different montra..
50
posted on
06/12/2004 12:44:16 PM PDT
by
Experiment 6-2-6
(Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!! Support Congressman Billybob! Go to www.Armorforcongress.com!!!)
To: null and void
Here is the non-DU gist of the second half of the story too.
IT IS DONE...
51
posted on
06/12/2004 12:47:02 PM PDT
by
trussell
(If stupidity was actually painful, some people would be on a permanent lidocane drip.)
To: Jeff Head
I am sure several hundred US Marines...
It will only take one - and I pray it's me. Semper Fi ...
52
posted on
06/12/2004 12:57:12 PM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: atomic conspiracy
. He said Friday night he will appeal any reassignment or termination. "They're firing me because of what I said, and the public's reaction to what I said," What does he think? That he owns the radio station?
53
posted on
06/12/2004 1:18:17 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
To: null and void
Did the FReeper who reported that jerk really get banned? That was mentioned in one of the threads. That would be ridiculous.
54
posted on
06/12/2004 1:24:20 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
( Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but they're not entitled to their own facts -D. Rumsfeld)
To: Experiment 6-2-6
If you've been paying attention, one of the big faults that homosexual activists find with RR is his "lack of response to the AIDS crisis" - and when they take that lie to the extreme, (which many do) that thousands have died of AIDS is his fault.
I guess you don't read many articles posted on FR lately.
Who else is going to say that about RR - conservatives?
55
posted on
06/12/2004 1:49:47 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
To: Grampa Dave
"This extreme hatred of President Reagan quite often comes from the aids infected homosexuals of America."
yeah guess 6 Billion dollars wasn't enough.
56
posted on
06/12/2004 1:54:13 PM PDT
by
mupcat
To: little jeremiah
No, I have problem with your logic and debating skills. I am sure that Homosexual activists blame Reagan. However, that does not mean the comment by the DJ about Reagan's response to the aids epidemic makes him a homosexual. In fact, it cheapens your argument that what he did was wrong.
Namecalling (or attempting to establish one as something less than worthy of discussion) is not what this thread or forum is about. Indeed, you are doing exactly what the DJ has done. (which made everyone angry enough to complain...
I suppose I am just suggesting that you grow up.
57
posted on
06/12/2004 2:06:24 PM PDT
by
Experiment 6-2-6
(Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!! Support Congressman Billybob! Go to www.Armorforcongress.com!!!)
To: Experiment 6-2-6
I wasn't name calling. I brought up the possibility that he just *might* be a homosexual. According to homosexuals and their supporters and enablers on the left, that's a good thing, anyway.
If he is a homosexual, it's not name calling, it would just be the simple truth. If he's not, I didn't say he is one, he just might be, on account of the two pieces of evidence I noticed.
I know you're a lawyer, and I'm just a simpleton with a GED (which I did quite well on, BTW!) - so I'm not very good with semantics and legal terminology.
Is it either illegal or immoral to conjecture that someone who made very offensive remarks on air just *might* be a homosexual? We can't go there? Are homosexuals sacred, or so evil we can't mention that someone might be one? I'm not sure of your tack here.
58
posted on
06/12/2004 2:20:17 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Rejection of absolutes = absolute chaos, then totalitarianism, and then absolute hell on earth.)
To: Scothia
...it's unlikely he will reproduce.The local kid killing clinic probably has his credit card on file.
59
posted on
06/12/2004 2:26:04 PM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(Freedom Stands Because Heroes Serve.)
To: atomic conspiracy
Wow, neither the AP (which published the article) nor the fired wanker invoked the First Amendment on his behalf.
Perhaps the lefties are learning that the First Amendment may protect freedom of speech, but it doesn't gaurantee job security.
60
posted on
06/12/2004 2:28:15 PM PDT
by
Vision Thing
(If you do not study Reagan, you'll never understand America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson