Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This just wasn't SCO's day. Their 'slander of title' lawsuit against Novell was dismissed. They have 30 days to see if they can come up with a better complaint. They also lost their motion to separate the IBM counterclaims regarding patent infringement from the rest of that lawsuit.

The ruling on the Novell suit also an included a denial of SCO's motion to remand the case back to state court. That is a bigger deal than it sounds, because in order to rule that way, the judge had to conclude that the issue of whether SCO owns any copyrights -- or whether Novell still owns them -- is up in the air and presents a Federal question, to wit whether the Asset Purchase Agreement together with Amendment 2 constitutute a "Section 204 writing" transferring copyrights. This means that IBM, Red Hat, and Autozone now have a judge's ruling that SCO's ownership of the UNIX copyrights is unclear and in dispute.

Many people think SCO will choose to pass on the judge's offer to re-file within 30 days, and instead accept the dismissal. They have already lost this lawsuit, because a win on Slander of Title requires malice, and there can't be malice where the title is in fact in dispute. What the judge is really offering them is a chance to settle the "who owns the copyrights" issue now, as opposed to waiting for a separate suit specifically over that issue.

8 posted on 06/10/2004 10:33:39 PM PDT by Nick Danger (With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nick Danger; BenLurkin; DB; DreadCthulhu

Welll....maybe we are getting closer to the end of this nonsense...


9 posted on 06/10/2004 10:40:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Nick Danger
What the judge is really offering them is a chance to settle the "who owns the copyrights" issue now, as opposed to waiting for a separate suit specifically over that issue.

Wow, a reasonable post by Nick Danger on the subject. Amazing since something like this is usually his cue to come dance on their grave only to be proven wrong again. This time, looks like he got it right. You can only be wrong so many times before the law of averages starts working in your favor, I suppose.

23 posted on 06/11/2004 8:09:05 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson