The ruling on the Novell suit also an included a denial of SCO's motion to remand the case back to state court. That is a bigger deal than it sounds, because in order to rule that way, the judge had to conclude that the issue of whether SCO owns any copyrights -- or whether Novell still owns them -- is up in the air and presents a Federal question, to wit whether the Asset Purchase Agreement together with Amendment 2 constitutute a "Section 204 writing" transferring copyrights. This means that IBM, Red Hat, and Autozone now have a judge's ruling that SCO's ownership of the UNIX copyrights is unclear and in dispute.
Many people think SCO will choose to pass on the judge's offer to re-file within 30 days, and instead accept the dismissal. They have already lost this lawsuit, because a win on Slander of Title requires malice, and there can't be malice where the title is in fact in dispute. What the judge is really offering them is a chance to settle the "who owns the copyrights" issue now, as opposed to waiting for a separate suit specifically over that issue.
Welll....maybe we are getting closer to the end of this nonsense...
Wow, a reasonable post by Nick Danger on the subject. Amazing since something like this is usually his cue to come dance on their grave only to be proven wrong again. This time, looks like he got it right. You can only be wrong so many times before the law of averages starts working in your favor, I suppose.