You're totally inconsistent. You blast Muslims without distinction, but say that it's a good thing that we liberated Muslims from Hussein. You won't admit it, but that implies that the Muslims we liberated are decent people who deserved to be liberated. You can't have it both ways - - 1) Islam and its adherents are bad, by definition; and 2) We need to go to war to liberate "good" Muslims from bad rulers; It's either 1 or 2, but you try to push both 1 and 2, so your posts, collectively, don't make sense (by the way, Saddam was a secularist, not a Muslim fundamentalist).
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040615-055649-4707r.htm
Iranian military massing at border of Iraq? Ring any bells?