Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP: Bush claims no recall of Iraq torture memo
AP ^ | 6.10.04

Posted on 06/10/2004 2:56:49 PM PDT by ambrose

Bush claims no recall of Iraq torture memo

The Associated Press

6/10/2004, 4:24 p.m. ET

SEA ISLAND, Ga. (AP) ? Addressing advice the White House got suggesting torture might be allowed for some terrorist interrogations, President Bush said Friday he ordered U.S. officials to act consistent with law and international treaties.

"What I authorized was staying within U.S. law," Bush said at the conclusion of the G-8 summit meeting here. The president said he doesn't recall seeing Justice Department advice about the conditions for such torture.

Asked repeatedly about it, Bush sidestepped a question about whether he thought torture was immoral, saying that his instructions were "to adhere to law. ... We're a nation of law" and "you might look at those laws."

The direction he provided was to "conform to U.S. law" and to act consistent with international treaty obligations, Bush said.

Administration officials say confidential Justice Department memos criticized by Democrats as laying the legal foundation for Iraqi prisoner abuses were aimed mainly at showing that international treaties banning torture do not apply to al-Qaida and Taliban prisoners.

Ashcroft refused earlier this week to release those memos to members of Congress.

The department's lawyers concluded that Taliban and al-Qaida fighters are not protected by the Geneva Conventions because they do not satisfy four main conditions of the treaty itself.

These include requirements to obey the laws of war, wear insignia recognizable from a distance and operate under the command of a responsible individual.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bleedingheartattack; bush43
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Philosophical question to the forum:

Is the use of torture always wrong? Even if we captured a terrorist who planted a nuke in a major U.S. city, but we did not know its location?

1 posted on 06/10/2004 2:56:50 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Is this a rhetorical question as well?


2 posted on 06/10/2004 2:58:04 PM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Is the use of torture always wrong?

Given your scenario, no.

But, it may not work.

3 posted on 06/10/2004 2:59:48 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Not to me, not if it's effective. However, I don't think torture is as effective with those whose goal is to be martyrs as it is with those who want to keep living.

I just love the way reporters word their articles. It says "Questions were asked" when it should say "The White House travelling press corps, of which I am a member, made complete fools of themselves again today, badgering President Bush with irrelevant questions that we hope will result in a 'gotcha.'"

4 posted on 06/10/2004 3:02:25 PM PDT by EllaMinnow ("President Reagan has left us, but he has left us stronger and better." President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Is the use of torture always wrong?

.....uhm, well.....

.....i consider having to get news from AP.....

.....torture.....

.....(and i bet W feels the same about answering their Q's).....

5 posted on 06/10/2004 3:02:30 PM PDT by cyberaxe (((.....does this mean I'm kewl now?.....)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The president said he doesn't recall ...

What was the exact wording? They're trying to paint him as Bubba!

6 posted on 06/10/2004 3:09:55 PM PDT by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Stick, meet Dead Horse. Dead Horse, meet Stick.

Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!Whack! Whack!...

7 posted on 06/10/2004 3:12:18 PM PDT by eureka! (May karma come back to the presstitutes and Rats in a material way.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokinleroy

Considering the fact that the President probably sees thousands of documents every week, I doubt anyone could remember them all. Of course the media is continuing to beat a dead horse now using some memo by a Justice Dept. paper pusher.


8 posted on 06/10/2004 3:12:27 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

He is answering the question abou the use of torture like he answered the question about his cocaine use. Stating the truth, but not answering the question.


9 posted on 06/10/2004 3:50:16 PM PDT by Lysander (Don't stand where I told you to stand. Stand where I told you to stand!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lysander

What cocain use?????????????????????????????


10 posted on 06/10/2004 4:57:03 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lysander

He never answered that question. He simply said he wasn't going to go there.


11 posted on 06/10/2004 5:00:42 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

It is not a torture. It is admonitory persuasion. If they really meant torture, we would have seen (or heard about) something qualitatively different from underwear on heads and bodies on a leash.


12 posted on 06/10/2004 5:05:31 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

If soldiers sodomizing prisoners with glow sticks isn't torture to you, what is it?

Americans aren't supposed to act like savages. We expect crap like this from the rag-heads; we shouldn't expect it or condone it from American GIs.

I don't care about most of what they did. But that is torture and if we condone it we are no better than the scum we are fighting.

President Bush condemned these acts. More Republicans should stand with him on this. Far too many are not.


13 posted on 06/10/2004 5:20:36 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Bush claims no recall of Iraq torture memo"

That is not what the President said.

14 posted on 06/10/2004 5:31:12 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

what did he say?


15 posted on 06/10/2004 5:33:41 PM PDT by ambrose (President Bush on Reagan: "His Work is Done and Now a Shining City Awaits Him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Is the use of torture always wrong?"

Man hell no! I'd cut the Pope's balls off if he knew about a terrorist attack and wouldn't come clean.

Ya gotta do whatcha gotta do.

They're either with us or against us.

16 posted on 06/10/2004 5:33:44 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

You have freepmail with the reply.


17 posted on 06/10/2004 5:35:29 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eureka!


There was a story on Fox today about the effort to get plastic surgery for the hundreds of soldiers that had their ears cut off as punishment by Saddam. And we're still beating that dead horse of getting naked with panties on their heads!


18 posted on 06/10/2004 5:35:45 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
""What I authorized was staying within U.S. law" The direction he provided was to "conform to U.S. law" and to act consistent with international treaty obligations, Bush said.

Ding!

19 posted on 06/10/2004 5:37:07 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

Largely ineffectual torture, not authorized in specific cases at the highest levels, but applied wholesale on a ad hoc basis not vetted by the chain of command, cannot be justified. It is immoral.


20 posted on 06/10/2004 8:21:57 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson